• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去50年牙科学生的迈尔斯-布里格斯性格类型指标人格剖析:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Dental students' Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality profile in the past 50 years: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Chenshuang, Azami Niloufar, Campos Hugo, Chan Michael, Van Anne Doan, Tisot Pamela, Goolsby Susie

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Division of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2024 Dec;88(12):1652-1665. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13660. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1002/jdd.13660
PMID:38984429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11637960/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dental students' personalities are strongly correlated with their didactic and clinical performances. With the significant changes in the social environment in the past decades, students' personalities may also change dramatically. Additionally, with the increasing number of international students admitted into US dental programs, educators must pay attention to the potential personality differences between domestic and international students.

BACKGROUND

A systematic review focusing on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality types of dental students was conducted with 11 literature databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. The quality assessment of each included article was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. Meta-analyses were conducted for each personality type within the United States in the past 50 years, and in each country in the past 20 years.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles (17 reports) were included after the eligibility assessment. The longitudinal trends within the United States showed the predominant two personality types have changed from Extraversion, Sensing, Feeling, and Judging (ESFJ) and Extraversion, Sensing, Thinking, and Judging (ESTJ) to ESTJ and Introversion, Sensing, Thinking, and Judging (ISTJ) during the past 50 years. When comparing different countries, the United States, China, Korea, and Iran have the same two dominant personality types (ESTJ and ISTJ) but not the Philippines (Extraversion, Intuition, Feeling, and Perceiving and Introversion, Intuition, Feeling, and Perceiving). However, there are large variations in the prevalence of other personality types.

CONCLUSION

There have been constant changes in the predominant personalities of dental students over the years. Additionally, understanding the diversity of personality types within the United States as well as among different countries could serve as the foundation for further improvements in teaching strategies and student support services.

摘要

背景

牙科学生的性格与他们的理论学习和临床实践表现密切相关。在过去几十年里,社会环境发生了重大变化,学生的性格也可能发生了巨大变化。此外,随着被美国牙科项目录取的国际学生数量不断增加,教育工作者必须关注国内和国际学生之间潜在的性格差异。

背景

按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,使用11个文献数据库对聚焦于牙科学生迈尔斯-布里格斯性格类型指标(Myers-Briggs Type Indicator)的研究进行了系统评价。按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所患病率批判性评价工具对每篇纳入文章进行质量评估。对美国过去50年以及每个国家过去20年的每种性格类型进行了Meta分析。

结果

经过资格评估后纳入了18篇文章(17份报告)。美国国内的纵向趋势显示,在过去50年里,占主导地位的两种性格类型已从外向、实感、情感、判断型(ESFJ)和外向、实感、思考、判断型(ESTJ)转变为ESTJ和内向、实感、思考、判断型(ISTJ)。在比较不同国家时,美国、中国、韩国和伊朗具有相同的两种主导性格类型(ESTJ和ISTJ),但菲律宾不同(外向、直觉、情感、感知型和内向、直觉、情感、感知型)。然而,其他性格类型的患病率存在很大差异。

结论

多年来牙科学生的主导性格一直在不断变化。此外,了解美国国内以及不同国家间性格类型的多样性可为进一步改进教学策略和学生支持服务奠定基础。

相似文献

1
Dental students' Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality profile in the past 50 years: Systematic review and meta-analysis.过去50年牙科学生的迈尔斯-布里格斯性格类型指标人格剖析:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Dent Educ. 2024 Dec;88(12):1652-1665. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13660. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水中分娩对新生儿死亡率和发病率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):180-231. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2105.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality differences in dental professionals: A cross-sectional survey.牙科专业人员的个性差异:横断面调查。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Dec;164(6):868-878.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.021. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
2
Acting Like a Baby Boomer? Birth-Cohort Differences in Adults' Personality Trajectories During the Last Half a Century.行为表现像婴儿潮一代?过去半个世纪中成年人个性轨迹的出生队列差异。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;33(3):382-396. doi: 10.1177/09567976211037971. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
《PRISMA 2020声明:系统评价报告的更新指南》
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Sep;74(9):790-799. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010.
4
A pilot survey of personality traits of dental students in the United States.美国牙科学生人格特质的初步调查。
Br Dent J. 2020 Sep;229(6):377-382. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2115-4. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
Factors affecting pre-doctoral dental students' selection of advanced dental education: A cross-sectional study.影响牙科学博士生选择高级牙科教育的因素:一项横断面研究。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Dec;84(12):1388-1398. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12343. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
Quality assessment of prevalence studies: a systematic review.患病率研究的质量评估:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.039. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Personality Types: Predictors for Pediatric Dentists-Pilot Study.人格类型:儿科牙医的预测因素——初步研究。
Tex Dent J. 2017 May;134(5):286-297.
8
The relationship between non-cognitive student attributes and academic achievements in a flipped learning classroom of a pre-dental science course.牙科学预科课程翻转课堂中,学生非认知属性与学业成绩之间的关系。
Korean J Med Educ. 2018 Dec;30(4):339-346. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.109. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
9
Study on Personality Types of Dentists in different Disciplines of Dentistry.牙科学不同学科牙医的性格类型研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):554-558. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2083.
10
Do Dental Students' Personality Types and Group Dynamics Affect Their Performance in Problem-Based Learning?牙科学生的性格类型和群体动态会影响他们在基于问题的学习中的表现吗?
J Dent Educ. 2017 Jun;81(6):744-751. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.015.