Suppr超能文献

实时患者安全审计:每日提升安全性。

Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day.

作者信息

Ursprung R, Gray J E, Edwards W H, Horbar J D, Nickerson J, Plsek P, Shiono P H, Suresh G K, Goldmann D A

机构信息

Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):284-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012542.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timely error detection including feedback to clinical staff is a prerequisite for focused improvement in patient safety. Real time auditing, the efficacy of which has been repeatedly demonstrated in industry, has not been used previously to evaluate patient safety. Methods successful at improving quality and safety in industry may provide avenues for improvement in patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

Pilot study to determine the feasibility and utility of real time safety auditing during routine clinical work in an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A 36 item patient safety checklist was developed via a modified Delphi technique. The checklist focused on errors associated with delays in care, equipment failure, diagnostic studies, information transfer and non-compliance with hospital policy. Safety audits were performed using the checklist during and after morning work rounds thrice weekly during the 5 week study period from January to March 2003.

RESULTS

A total of 338 errors were detected; 27 (75%) of the 36 items on the checklist detected >or=1 error. Diverse error types were found including unlabeled medication at the bedside (n = 31), ID band missing or in an inappropriate location (n = 70), inappropriate pulse oximeter alarm setting (n = 22), and delay in communication/information transfer that led to a delay in appropriate care (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Real time safety audits performed during routine work can detect a broad range of errors. Significant safety problems were detected promptly, leading to rapid changes in policy and practice. Staff acceptance was facilitated by fostering a blame free "culture of patient safety" involving clinical personnel in detection of remediable gaps in performance, and limiting the burden of data collection.

摘要

背景

及时发现错误并向临床工作人员反馈是重点改善患者安全的前提条件。实时审计在行业中其有效性已得到反复证明,但此前尚未用于评估患者安全。在行业中成功提高质量和安全性的方法可能为改善患者安全提供途径。

目的

进行一项试点研究,以确定在重症监护病房(ICU)的日常临床工作中进行实时安全审计的可行性和实用性。

方法

通过改良的德尔菲技术制定了一份包含36项内容的患者安全检查表。该检查表侧重于与护理延误、设备故障、诊断研究、信息传递以及不符合医院政策相关的错误。在2003年1月至3月为期5周的研究期间,每周三次在晨间查房期间及之后使用该检查表进行安全审计。

结果

共检测到338处错误;检查表上36项中的27项(75%)检测到≥1处错误。发现了多种类型的错误,包括床边未贴标签的药物(n = 31)、身份识别带缺失或位置不当(n = 70)、脉搏血氧仪警报设置不当(n = 22)以及导致适当护理延误的沟通/信息传递延迟(n = 4)。

结论

在日常工作中进行的实时安全审计能够检测到广泛的错误。重大安全问题被迅速发现,从而促使政策和实践迅速改变。通过营造一种无指责的“患者安全文化”,让临床人员参与发现可补救的绩效差距,并限制数据收集负担,促进了工作人员的接受度。

相似文献

1
Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):284-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012542.
2
Audits in real time for safety in critical care: definition and pilot study.
Med Intensiva. 2014 Nov;38(8):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.11.008. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
4
Feasibility and utility of the use of real time random safety audits in adult ICU patients: a multicentre study.
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):1089-98. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3792-3. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
The safety checklist program: creating a culture of safety in intensive care units.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Jun;28(6):306-15. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28030-x.
6
Medication Error Minimization Scheme (MEMS) in an adult tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) 2009-2011.
Aust Crit Care. 2013 May;26(2):58-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
8
Real-time random safety audits: A transforming tool adapted to new times.
Med Intensiva. 2017 Aug-Sep;41(6):368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
10
Improving patient safety in the endoscopy unit: utilization of remote video auditing to improve time-out compliance.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):424-429. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.237. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring strategies to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review.
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Jan 14;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00426-2.
2
Equipment preparedness for neonatal resuscitation in neonatal intensive care unit in resource limited setting: cross-sectional study.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Feb 28;86(4):1915-1919. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001801. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
How do healthcare providers use national audit data for improvement?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09334-6.
4
Assessment of the Use of Patient Vital Sign Data for Preventing Misidentification and Medical Errors.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;10(12):2440. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122440.
5
Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248677. eCollection 2021.
6
Patients and relatives as auditors of safe practices in oncology and hematology day hospitals.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06018-3.
7
Implementation of a Neonatal Audit Tool to Drive Quality Initiatives.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Nov 19;4(6):e224. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000224. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
8
Exploring the usefulness of Lexis diagrams for quality improvement.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1017-3.
9
Managing alarm systems for quality and safety in the hospital setting.
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 25;7(3):e000202. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000202. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric patient safety in hospitals: a national picture in 2000.
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1741-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1741.
2
Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care.
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1609-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1609.
4
Preventing provider errors: online total parenteral nutrition calculator.
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):748-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.748.
5
Resolving our uncertainty about oxygen therapy.
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 1):1415-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.6.1415.
6
Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):458-64. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.458.
7
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
8
Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.194.
9
Patient safety events during pediatric hospitalizations.
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 1):1358-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.6.1358.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验