Kim Juhee, Must Aviva, Fitzmaurice Garrett M, Gillman Matthew W, Chomitz Virginia, Kramer Ellen, McGowan Robert, Peterson Karen E
677 Huntington Avenue, III-616, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Obes Res. 2005 Jul;13(7):1246-54. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.148.
We examined the relationship between comprehensive fitness tests and overweight using a school surveillance system in a racially diverse city in the United States.
Trained physical education teachers measured weight, height, and fitness annually from 2001 to 2003. We compiled data for a cross-sectional analysis (11,845 measurements on 6297 students, 5 to 14 years of age) and a 1-year prospective analysis (4215 measurements on 2927 students not overweight at baseline, 5 to 13 years of age). Overweight was defined as a BMI > or =95th percentile (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts), and underfit was defined as failing at least one of five fitness tests: endurance run, abdominal strength, flexibility, upper body strength, and agility (Amateur Athletic Union and Fitnessgram). Associations between fitness and overweight were examined using multivariate logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic status and repeated measurements over time.
The mean number of fitness tests passed was lower among students with a BMI above the 80th percentile. Overweight incidence over 1 year was 7% and 2% for underfit and fit girls, respectively (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 5.6). Not passing either the endurance run or upper body strength test was associated with overweight incidence in both boys and girls. After adjusting for baseline BMI, the endurance run remained a significant predictor of incident overweight among girls (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.5).
Findings support a cross-sectional inverse relationship between physical fitness and overweight among school-aged children. The direction of causation between fitness and overweight is not clearly established and merits further study.
我们利用美国一个种族多元化城市的学校监测系统,研究了综合体能测试与超重之间的关系。
2001年至2003年,受过培训的体育教师每年测量体重、身高和体能。我们收集了用于横断面分析的数据(对6297名5至14岁学生进行了11845次测量)以及1年的前瞻性分析数据(对2927名基线时未超重的5至13岁学生进行了4215次测量)。超重定义为体重指数(BMI)大于或等于第95百分位数(疾病控制与预防中心2000年生长图表),体能不佳定义为五项体能测试中至少一项未通过:耐力跑、腹部力量、柔韧性、上肢力量和敏捷性(美国业余体育联合会和体能gram)。使用多变量逻辑回归模型研究体能与超重之间的关联,并对社会人口统计学状况和随时间的重复测量进行了调整。
BMI高于第80百分位数的学生通过的体能测试平均次数较少。体能不佳和体能良好的女孩1年超重发生率分别为7%和2%(优势比为3.3;95%置信区间为2.0至5.6)。耐力跑或上肢力量测试未通过与男孩和女孩的超重发生率均相关。在对基线BMI进行调整后,耐力跑仍然是女孩超重发生率的一个显著预测因素(优势比为2.0;95%置信区间为1.1至3.5)。
研究结果支持学龄儿童体能与超重之间存在横断面反向关系。体能与超重之间因果关系的方向尚未明确确立,值得进一步研究。