Errisuriz V L, Golaszewski N M, Born K, Bartholomew J B
Latino Research Initiative, The University of Texas at Austin, 210 W. 24th Street, F9200, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, D3700, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
J Prim Prev. 2018 Jun;39(3):303-327. doi: 10.1007/s10935-018-0507-x.
Physical education (PE)-based interventions are a popular method to target children's physical activity (PA) and fitness; however, little is known about their effectiveness or what factors lead to successful interventions. This paper: (1) systematically reviews studies examining PE interventions designed to impact PA, fitness, and/or body composition; and (2) makes recommendations for new research directions based upon these findings. Our systematic review was limited to experimental and quasi-experimental studies conducted in elementary schools. We conducted literature searches using predetermined keywords in 3 databases, identified a total of 4964 potentially relevant studies, and screened their abstracts and full texts for eligibility. This resulted in 12 relevant studies. We used criteria established by Downs and Black (1998) to assess each study's methodological quality. PE interventions consistently showed increases in moderate-to-vigorous PA or vigorous PA during PE class but were less consistent in impacting leisure-time PA. PE interventions affected body composition differentially, depending on the assessment used (i.e., body mass index or skinfold thickness). Half of the studies assessing fitness did not show a significant impact; however, those that did were designed to influence fitness outcomes. Few studies assessed psychosocial determinants regarding PA, and no study demonstrated significant impacts on constructs other than knowledge. Interventions often contained multiple components (e.g., diet, family) implemented alongside PE interventions. Identifying effective intervention components was difficult due to lack of process evaluation. We identify the need for future research to use more objective and accurate PA measurements and adiposity, incorporate measurement of psychological constructs, expand interventions' theoretical basis, and include strong process evaluation.
基于体育教育(PE)的干预措施是促进儿童身体活动(PA)和健康的常用方法;然而,对于其有效性或导致成功干预的因素却知之甚少。本文:(1)系统回顾了旨在影响PA、健康和/或身体成分的体育教育干预研究;(2)根据这些发现为新的研究方向提出建议。我们的系统回顾仅限于在小学进行的实验性和准实验性研究。我们使用预先确定的关键词在3个数据库中进行文献检索,共识别出4964项潜在相关研究,并筛选其摘要和全文以确定是否符合条件。这产生了12项相关研究。我们使用唐斯和布莱克(1998年)制定的标准来评估每项研究的方法学质量。体育教育干预措施在体育课期间持续显示中等到剧烈的PA或剧烈PA有所增加,但在影响休闲时间的PA方面则不太一致。体育教育干预措施对身体成分的影响因所使用的评估方法(即体重指数或皮褶厚度)而异。评估健康状况的研究中有一半没有显示出显著影响;然而,那些显示出显著影响的研究旨在影响健康结果。很少有研究评估与PA相关的心理社会决定因素,没有研究表明对知识以外的结构有显著影响。干预措施通常包含与体育教育干预措施同时实施的多个组成部分(如饮食、家庭)。由于缺乏过程评估,难以确定有效的干预组成部分。我们确定未来的研究需要使用更客观准确的PA测量方法和肥胖测量方法,纳入心理结构的测量,扩展干预措施的理论基础,并包括强有力的过程评估。