Glazebrook Jane
Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205-27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923.
It has been suggested that effective defense against biotrophic pathogens is largely due to programmed cell death in the host, and to associated activation of defense responses regulated by the salicylic acid-dependent pathway. In contrast, necrotrophic pathogens benefit from host cell death, so they are not limited by cell death and salicylic acid-dependent defenses, but rather by a different set of defense responses activated by jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling. This review summarizes results from Arabidopsis-pathogen systems regarding the contributions of various defense responses to resistance to several biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. While the model above seems generally correct, there are exceptions and additional complexities.
有人提出,对活体营养型病原体的有效防御很大程度上归因于宿主中的程序性细胞死亡,以及水杨酸依赖性途径调节的防御反应的相关激活。相比之下,死体营养型病原体从宿主细胞死亡中获益,因此它们不受细胞死亡和水杨酸依赖性防御的限制,而是受茉莉酸和乙烯信号激活的另一套防御反应的限制。本综述总结了拟南芥 - 病原体系统中关于各种防御反应对几种活体营养型和死体营养型病原体抗性贡献的研究结果。虽然上述模型似乎总体上是正确的,但也存在例外情况和其他复杂性。