Cordonnier Catherine, Herbrecht Raoul, Buzyn Agnès, Leverger Guy, Leclercq Roland, Nitenberg Gérard, Bastuji-Garin Sylvie
Hematology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital, 94000 Créteil, France.
Haematologica. 2005 Aug;90(8):1102-9.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of Gram-negative bacterial infections in febrile neutropenic patients and to develop a specific risk score.
This prospective study included 513 consecutive febrile neutropenic, evaluable patients. Forty-five per cent of the patients were receiving prophylactic gut decontamination, and 6% were receiving prophylactic quinolones at the onset of febrile neutropenia. Data were collected from the onset of febrile neutropenia until 30 days later. Risk factors for Gram-negative bacterial infection were identified by comparing baseline characteristics of patients with and without Gram-negative bacterial infection. Independent risk factors in multivariate analysis were used to build a predictive score for Gram-negative bacterial infection.
The prevalence of Gram-negative bacterial infection was 55/513 (10.7%). Gram-negative bacterial infections were due to E. coli in 30 patients, other enterobacteriae in 11, Pseudomonas spp. in 13, and Salmonella spp. in one. In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of Gram-negative bacterial infection was significantly associated with age > 45 years (p=0.009), recent administration of betalactams (p=0.04), chills (p=0.0001), urinary symptoms (p=0.01), and absence of gut decontamination with both colimycin and aminoglycosides (p=0.001). The relative risk for Gram-negative bacterial infection was 4.4, 12.6, 25.4 and 100 in the presence of 1, 2, 3 , or at least 4 parameters, respectively. The performances of our scoring system and the post-test probabilities according to different prevalence rates of Gram-negative bacterial infection (0.05, 0.10, 0.20) lead us to propose a Gram-negative risk score of >or=3 as indicating a high probability of Gram-negative bacterial infection.
Our scoring system identifies patients with a high probability of Gram-negative bacterial infection as those with a score >or=3. If confirmed in a validation set, this score could be considered in the choice of the first-line antibiotics in febrile neutropenic patients.
本研究的目的是评估发热性中性粒细胞减少患者革兰氏阴性菌感染的风险,并制定一个特定的风险评分。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了513例连续的、可评估的发热性中性粒细胞减少患者。45%的患者在发热性中性粒细胞减少发作时接受预防性肠道去污,6%的患者接受预防性喹诺酮类药物治疗。从发热性中性粒细胞减少发作开始至30天后收集数据。通过比较有和没有革兰氏阴性菌感染患者的基线特征来确定革兰氏阴性菌感染的危险因素。多变量分析中的独立危险因素用于构建革兰氏阴性菌感染的预测评分。
革兰氏阴性菌感染的患病率为55/513(10.7%)。30例革兰氏阴性菌感染是由大肠杆菌引起的,11例由其他肠杆菌引起,13例由假单胞菌属引起,1例由沙门氏菌属引起。在多变量分析中,革兰氏阴性菌感染的发生与年龄>45岁(p=0.009)、近期使用β-内酰胺类药物(p=0.04)、寒战(p=0.0001)、泌尿系统症状(p=0.01)以及未同时使用黏菌素和氨基糖苷类进行肠道去污(p=0.001)显著相关。在存在1、2、3或至少4个参数时,革兰氏阴性菌感染的相对风险分别为4.4、12.6、25.4和100。我们评分系统的性能以及根据革兰氏阴性菌感染不同患病率(0.05、0.10、0.20)的检验后概率使我们提出革兰氏阴性风险评分为≥3表明革兰氏阴性菌感染的可能性很高。
我们的评分系统将革兰氏阴性菌感染可能性高的患者识别为评分≥3的患者。如果在验证集中得到证实,该评分可用于发热性中性粒细胞减少患者一线抗生素的选择。