Coupling between conformation and proton binding in proteins.

Interest centers here on whether the use of a fixed charge distribution of a protein solute, or a treatment that considers proton-binding equilibria by solving the Poisson equation, is a better approach to discriminate native from non-native conformations of proteins. In this analysis of the charge distribution of 7 proteins, we estimate the solvation free energy contribution to the total free energy by exploring the 2(zeta) possible ionization states of the whole molecule, with zeta being the number of ionizable groups in the amino acid sequence, for every conformation in the ensembles of 7 proteins. As an additional consideration of the role of electrostatic interactions in determining the charge distribution of native folds, we carried out a comparison of alternative charge assignment models for the ionizable residues in a set of 21 native-like proteins. The results of this work indicate that (1) for 6 out of 7 proteins, estimation of solvent polarization based on the Generalized Born model with a fixed charge distribution provides the optimal trade-off between accuracy, with respect to the Poisson equation, and speed when compared to the accessible surface area model; for the seventh protein, consideration of all possible ionization states of the whole molecule appears to be crucial to discriminate the native from non-native conformations; (2) significant differences in the degree of ionization and hence the charge distribution for native folds are found between the different charge models examined; (3) the stability of the native state is determined by a delicate balance of all the energy components, and (4) conformational entropy, and hence the dynamics of folding, may play a crucial role for a successful ab initio protein folding prediction.