Ghadially R
Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, VA Medical Center, 94121, USA.
Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop. 2005(54):45-62. doi: 10.1007/3-540-37644-5_4.
Recent studies are beginning to reveal that our basic concepts of epidermal stem cell biology may be based on somewhat tenuous ground. For example, it is often assumed that colony-forming cells represent epidermal stem cells, although this has not proved to be the case in hematopoietic cell lineages. In addition, although most stem cells are not cycling, label-retaining cells are used as a primary measure of epidermal stem cells. Moreover, the locations of stem cell niches in epidermis are still being debated. Finally, while putative stem cell markers abound, the most effective isolation procedure for stem cells has not been determined, and the relative efficiency of various methods of stem cell isolation remains unknown. With a functional assay for epidermal stem cells (analogous to the in-vivo competitive assay used for hematopoiesis), we appear to be in a better position to more clearly define the molecular signature of the true long-term repopulating cell/stem cell of the epidermis. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in regenerative therapy of the epidermis for ulcer and burn treatment, and for corrective gene therapy for inherited skin diseases.
最近的研究开始揭示,我们关于表皮干细胞生物学的基本概念可能建立在不太可靠的基础之上。例如,人们常常认为集落形成细胞代表表皮干细胞,尽管在造血细胞谱系中并非如此。此外,虽然大多数干细胞不处于细胞周期,但标记保留细胞被用作表皮干细胞的主要衡量标准。而且,表皮中干细胞微环境的位置仍存在争议。最后,虽然假定的干细胞标志物很多,但尚未确定最有效的干细胞分离程序,各种干细胞分离方法的相对效率也仍然未知。通过一种用于表皮干细胞的功能测定法(类似于用于造血的体内竞争性测定法),我们似乎更有能力更清晰地定义表皮真正的长期再填充细胞/干细胞的分子特征。尽管如此,在用于溃疡和烧伤治疗的表皮再生疗法以及用于遗传性皮肤病的矫正基因疗法方面已经取得了重大进展。