Grassi Bruno, Hogan Michael C, Kelley Kevin M, Howlett Richard A, Gladden L Bruce
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Milano, LITA - Via Fratelli Cervi 93, I -20090 Segrate (MI), Italy.
J Physiol. 2005 Nov 1;568(Pt 3):1021-33. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.090068. Epub 2005 Aug 4.
Nitric oxide (NO) has an inhibitory action on O2 uptake (VO2) at the level of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of NO synthase (NOS) inhibition on muscle (VO2) kinetics. Isolated canine gastrocnemius muscles in situ (n = 6) were studied during transitions from rest to 4-min of electrically stimulated contractions corresponding to approximately 60% of the muscle peak . Two conditions were compared: (i) Control (CTRL) and (ii) L-NAME, in which the NOS inhibitor L-NAME (20 mg kg(-1)) was administered. In both conditions the muscle was pump-perfused with constantly elevated blood flow (Q), at a level measured during a preliminary contraction trial with spontaneous self-perfused (Q). A vasodilatory drug was also infused. Arterial and venous O2 concentrations were determined at rest and at 5-7 s intervals during the transition. VO2 was calculated by Fick's principle. Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest and during contractions. Muscle force was measured continuously. Phosphocreatine hydrolysis and the calculated substrate level phosphorylation were slightly (but not significantly) lower in L-NAME than in CTRL. Significantly (P < 0.05) less fatigue was found in L-NAME versus CTRL. The time delay (TD(f)) and the time constant (tau(f)) of the 'fundamental' component of VO2 kinetics were not significantly different between CTRL (TD(f) 7.2 +/- 1.2 s; and tau(f) 10.6 +/- 1.3, +/- s.e.m.) and L-NAME (TD(f) 9.3 +/- 0.6; and tau(f) 10.4 +/- 1.0). Contrary to our hypothesis, NOS inhibition did not accelerate muscle VO2 kinetics. The down-regulation of mitochondrial respiration by NO does not limit the kinetics of adjustment of oxidative metabolism at exercise onset.
一氧化氮(NO)在线粒体呼吸链水平对氧气摄取(VO2)具有抑制作用。本研究的目的是评估一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制对肌肉(VO2)动力学的影响。在从静息状态转变为对应约60%肌肉峰值的4分钟电刺激收缩过程中,对6只犬的原位腓肠肌进行了研究。比较了两种情况:(i)对照组(CTRL)和(ii)L-NAME组,其中给予NOS抑制剂L-NAME(20 mg kg(-1))。在两种情况下,肌肉均通过泵灌注使血流量(Q)持续升高,达到在初步自发自灌注收缩试验中测得的水平。还输注了一种血管舒张药物。在静息状态以及转变过程中每隔5 - 7秒测定动脉和静脉氧浓度。VO2通过菲克原理计算得出。在静息状态和收缩过程中获取肌肉活检样本。持续测量肌肉力量。L-NAME组中磷酸肌酸水解和计算得出的底物水平磷酸化略低于(但无显著差异)对照组。与对照组相比,L-NAME组疲劳明显减轻(P < 0.05)。VO2动力学“基本”成分的时间延迟(TD(f))和时间常数(tau(f))在对照组(TD(f) 7.2 +/- 1.2秒;tau(f) 10.6 +/- 1.3,+/-标准误)和L-NAME组(TD(f) 9.3 +/- 0.6;tau(f) 10.4 +/- 1.0)之间无显著差异。与我们的假设相反,NOS抑制并未加速肌肉VO2动力学。NO对线粒体呼吸的下调并不限制运动开始时氧化代谢的调节动力学。