Ebert J N, Ewing J H, Rogers M H, Reynolds D J
J Genet Psychol. 1977 Mar;130(1st Half):83-94. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1977.10533233.
It was hypothesized that primary process expression on Gottschalk's Five Minute Verbalization Task (FMV) would be more representative of clinical status in schizophrenia than primary process expression on the Rorschach. Ss were 21 males and 15 females, ages 19-41 years, newly admitted to the hospital and treated with phenothiazines. The FMV was administered at predrug, five weeks, and 13 weeks, and the Rorschach at predrug and five weeks. Primary process scoring was according to the Holt system. Clinical improvement was measured by the Lorr IMPS and the Burdock Ward Behavior Scale. Over time, Ss produced less primary process on the FMV (p less than .001), while on the Rorschach scores did not change significantly. The scores on the FMV but not on the Rorschach paralleled some measures of clinical improvement (p less than .05). In a factor analysis, scores on the FMV and Rorschach were related to specific but different symptoms. It was concluded that the FMV was more effective in determining clinical improvement, while the Rorschach was perhaps more valuable in assessing the nature of the primary process thinking.
研究假设是,在戈特沙尔克五分钟言语表达任务(FMV)中,原发性过程表达比在罗夏墨迹测验中更能代表精神分裂症的临床状态。研究对象为21名男性和15名女性,年龄在19至41岁之间,均为新入院且接受吩噻嗪治疗的患者。FMV测验在用药前、用药五周和用药13周时进行,罗夏墨迹测验在用药前和用药五周时进行。原发性过程评分依据霍尔特系统。临床改善情况通过洛尔IMPS量表和伯德克病房行为量表进行测量。随着时间推移,研究对象在FMV中产生的原发性过程减少(p小于0.001),而在罗夏墨迹测验中的得分没有显著变化。FMV的得分与一些临床改善指标平行,但罗夏墨迹测验的得分并非如此(p小于0.05)。在一项因素分析中,FMV和罗夏墨迹测验的得分与特定但不同的症状相关。研究得出结论,FMV在确定临床改善方面更有效,而罗夏墨迹测验在评估原发性过程思维的本质方面可能更有价值。