Chen X Josette, Kovacevic Natasa, Lobaugh Nancy J, Sled John G, Henkelman R Mark, Henderson Jeffrey T
Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Medical Biophysics, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8.
Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
The search for new mouse models of human disease requires a sensitive metric to make three-dimensional (3D) anatomical comparisons in a rapid and quantifiable manner. This is especially true in the brain, where changes in complex shapes such as the hippocampus and ventricles are difficult to assess with 2D histology. Here, we report that the 3D neuroanatomy of three strains of mice (129S1/SvImJ, C57/Bl6, and CD1) is significantly different from one another. Using image co-registration, we 'morphed' together nine brains of each strain scanned by magnetic resonance imaging at (60 microm)3 resolution to synthesize an average image. We applied three methods of comparison. First, we used visual inspection and graphically examined the standard deviation of the variability in each strain. Second, we annotated 42 neural structures and compared their volumes across the strains. Third, we assessed significant local deviations in volume and displacement between the two inbred strains, independent of prior anatomical knowledge.
寻找人类疾病的新型小鼠模型需要一种灵敏的指标,以便快速且可量化地进行三维(3D)解剖学比较。在大脑中尤其如此,因为诸如海马体和脑室等复杂形状的变化很难通过二维组织学来评估。在此,我们报告三种小鼠品系(129S1/SvImJ、C57/Bl6和CD1)的三维神经解剖结构彼此之间存在显著差异。利用图像配准技术,我们将每种品系的九个通过磁共振成像以(60微米)³分辨率扫描的大脑“变形”在一起,以合成一个平均图像。我们应用了三种比较方法。首先,我们通过目视检查并以图形方式检查了每种品系中变异性的标准差。其次,我们标注了42个神经结构,并比较了它们在不同品系间的体积。第三,我们评估了两个近交系之间在体积和位移方面的显著局部偏差,而不依赖于先前的解剖学知识。