• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钠通道阻滞激发试验期间Brugada型反应的心电图预测指标

Electrocardiographic predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge.

作者信息

Hermida Jean-Sylvain, Denjoy Isabelle, Jarry Geneviève, Jandaud Serge, Bertrand Cathy, Delonca Jean

机构信息

Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, France.

出版信息

Europace. 2005 Sep;7(5):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.05.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.05.005
PMID:16087108
Abstract

AIM

To identify ECG predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge.

METHODS

We studied prospectively 103 patients (M = 76, 45 +/- 13 years) in whom ECGs were collected during ajmaline challenge. ECG recordings included the high right precordial leads (-2V(1) and -2V(2)). A positive response was defined by a >0.2 mV J point or ST segment elevation and a down-sloping pattern of the ST segment in at least one right precordial lead.

RESULTS

Ajmaline challenge was positive in 48 (47%) of the 103 cases. Baseline J wave elevation was greater in -2V(1) (0.077 +/- 0.078 mV vs. 0.038 +/- 0.046 mV, P = 0.003) and -2V(2) (0.149 +/- 0.103 mV vs. 0.043 +/- 0.088 mV, P < 0.001) in cases with a subsequent positive response. In contrast, ST segment elevation and T wave amplitudes were reduced in V(1), V(2) and V(3). Logistic regression showed that J wave elevation in -2V(2) and decreased T wave amplitude in V(3) at baseline were independent predictors of a positive response. Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) had a specificity of 100%, a sensitivity of 40%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 28%.

CONCLUSION

J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) was the strongest predictor of a Brugada type response to Na channel blockade challenge when Brugada syndrome was suspected on a baseline ECG.

摘要

目的

确定钠通道阻滞剂激发试验期间Brugada型反应的心电图预测指标。

方法

我们前瞻性地研究了103例患者(男性76例,年龄45±13岁),在阿义马林激发试验期间收集其心电图。心电图记录包括高位右胸导联(-2V1和-2V2)。阳性反应定义为至少一个右胸导联的J点或ST段抬高>0.2 mV以及ST段呈下斜型。

结果

103例患者中48例(47%)阿义马林激发试验呈阳性。后续呈阳性反应的病例中,基线J波抬高在-2V1(0.077±0.078 mV对0.038±0.046 mV,P = 0.003)和-2V2(0.149±0.103 mV对0.043±0.088 mV,P<0.001)导联中更高。相比之下,V1、V2和V3导联的ST段抬高和T波振幅降低。逻辑回归显示,基线时-2V2导联的J波抬高和V3导联的T波振幅降低是阳性反应的独立预测指标。基线时-2V2导联J波抬高>0.16 mV的特异性为100%,敏感性为40%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为28%。

结论

当基线心电图怀疑有Brugada综合征时,-2V2导联J波抬高>0.16 mV是对钠通道阻滞剂激发试验呈Brugada型反应的最强预测指标。

相似文献

1
Electrocardiographic predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge.钠通道阻滞激发试验期间Brugada型反应的心电图预测指标
Europace. 2005 Sep;7(5):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.05.005.
2
Response to intravenous ajmaline: a retrospective analysis of 677 ajmaline challenges.静脉注射阿马林的反应:677 例阿马林挑战的回顾性分析。
Europace. 2009 Oct;11(10):1345-52. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup189. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
3
New electrocardiographic criteria for discriminating between Brugada types 2 and 3 patterns and incomplete right bundle branch block.新的心电图标准可用于鉴别 Brugada 型 2 型和 3 型图形与不完全性右束支传导阻滞。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 22;58(22):2290-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.039.
4
Correlation of intracardiac electrogram with surface electrocardiogram in Brugada syndrome patients.Brugada 综合征患者心内电图与体表心电图的相关性。
Europace. 2014 Jun;16(6):908-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut294. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
5
Autonomic and antiarrhythmic drug modulation of ST segment elevation in patients with Brugada syndrome.Brugada综合征患者自主神经及抗心律失常药物对ST段抬高的调节作用
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1061-70. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00613-3.
6
Prevalence and clinical course of the juveniles with Brugada-type ECG in Japanese population.日本人群中具有Brugada型心电图的青少年的患病率及临床病程。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;28(6):549-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40020.x.
7
Cibenzoline induced Brugada ECG pattern.西苯唑啉诱发Brugada心电图模式。
Europace. 2005 Nov;7(6):537-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.06.013.
8
Automated detection of Brugada-type electrocardiogram using diagnostic criteria of the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association.
J Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct;38(4 Suppl):96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.010.
9
Is a drug-challenge test with propafenone adequate to exclude Brugada syndrome?用普罗帕酮进行药物激发试验是否足以排除 Brugada 综合征?
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013 Mar 23;24(2):e4-6. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2012-068.
10
Changes in body surface potential distributions induced by isoproterenol and Na channel blockers in patients with the Brugada syndrome.
Int J Cardiol. 2004 Jun;95(2-3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.05.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Significance of the Sodium Channel Blocker Test in Patients With Brugada Syndrome.钠离子通道阻滞剂试验对 Brugada 综合征患者的预后意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 10;7(10):e008617. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008617.