Suppr超能文献

专科医院与社区医院:法律应发挥何种作用?

Specialty versus community hospitals: what role for the law?

作者信息

Choudhry Sujit, Choudhry Niteesh K, Brennan Troyen A

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine, and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-361-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.361.

Abstract

U.S. health care has long featured a struggle between regulation and markets as vehicles of reform, and the community hospital is at the center of this struggle. The key to its financial viability is cross-subsidization, whereby revenues from insured patients subsidize the care of the uninsured and underinsured, and profits from well-compensated services support those operating at a loss. Cross-subsidization has been challenged by efforts to move highly compensated services and well-insured patients to ambulatory surgical centers and specialty hospitals. We review the ongoing battle between through a legal lens and offer conjectures about the outcome. Refined certificate-of-need regulation may be the preferable policy choice.

摘要

长期以来,美国医疗保健领域一直存在着监管与市场作为改革手段之间的斗争,而社区医院正是这场斗争的核心。其财务可行性的关键在于交叉补贴,即来自参保患者的收入补贴未参保和保险不足患者的医疗费用,以及高补偿服务的利润支持那些亏损运营的服务。交叉补贴受到了将高补偿服务和高保险患者转移到门诊手术中心和专科医院的努力的挑战。我们从法律角度审视这场持续的斗争,并对结果进行推测。完善的需求证明监管可能是更可取的政策选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验