Suppr超能文献

[痴呆筛查:认知筛查测试(CST)和简易精神状态检查表的效度]

[Screening for dementia: validity of the Cognitive Screening Test (CST) and the Mini-Mental State Examination].

作者信息

Ponds R W, Verhey F R, Rozendaal N, Jolles J, Deelman B G

机构信息

Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, afdeling Klinische Psychiatrie.

出版信息

Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1992 Jun;23(3):94-9.

PMID:1609450
Abstract

The Cognitive Screening Test (CST--short version), a Dutch orientation questionnaire, and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were compared with respect to their ability to discriminate between mildly demented, moderately demented and non-demented patients. The difference between mildly and moderately demented patients was based on the Global Deterioration Scale score. The CST and the MMSE were administered to patients who had been referred to the Memory Clinic of the University Hospital of Maastricht. Both instruments were successful in discriminating moderately and severely demented from non-demented patients. The CST and the MMSE were also successful with respect to the classification of depressive, non-demented elderly patients. The CST did not succeed in the correct classification of mildly demented patients (50% false-negative). The results of the MMSE in this group of mildly demented patients were moderate (25% false-negative). It is concluded that the value of both screening instruments, and especially the short version of the CST is limited for clinical practice.

摘要

对认知筛查测试(CST简版)、一份荷兰定向调查问卷和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)区分轻度痴呆、中度痴呆和非痴呆患者的能力进行了比较。轻度和中度痴呆患者之间的差异基于总体衰退量表评分。对转诊至马斯特里赫特大学医院记忆门诊的患者进行了CST和MMSE测试。两种工具都成功地区分了中度和重度痴呆患者与非痴呆患者。CST和MMSE在对抑郁的非痴呆老年患者进行分类方面也取得了成功。CST未能正确分类轻度痴呆患者(假阴性率为50%)。MMSE在这组轻度痴呆患者中的结果一般(假阴性率为25%)。结论是,两种筛查工具,尤其是CST简版在临床实践中的价值有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验