Ponds R W, Verhey F R, Rozendaal N, Jolles J, Deelman B G
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, afdeling Klinische Psychiatrie.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1992 Jun;23(3):94-9.
The Cognitive Screening Test (CST--short version), a Dutch orientation questionnaire, and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were compared with respect to their ability to discriminate between mildly demented, moderately demented and non-demented patients. The difference between mildly and moderately demented patients was based on the Global Deterioration Scale score. The CST and the MMSE were administered to patients who had been referred to the Memory Clinic of the University Hospital of Maastricht. Both instruments were successful in discriminating moderately and severely demented from non-demented patients. The CST and the MMSE were also successful with respect to the classification of depressive, non-demented elderly patients. The CST did not succeed in the correct classification of mildly demented patients (50% false-negative). The results of the MMSE in this group of mildly demented patients were moderate (25% false-negative). It is concluded that the value of both screening instruments, and especially the short version of the CST is limited for clinical practice.
对认知筛查测试(CST简版)、一份荷兰定向调查问卷和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)区分轻度痴呆、中度痴呆和非痴呆患者的能力进行了比较。轻度和中度痴呆患者之间的差异基于总体衰退量表评分。对转诊至马斯特里赫特大学医院记忆门诊的患者进行了CST和MMSE测试。两种工具都成功地区分了中度和重度痴呆患者与非痴呆患者。CST和MMSE在对抑郁的非痴呆老年患者进行分类方面也取得了成功。CST未能正确分类轻度痴呆患者(假阴性率为50%)。MMSE在这组轻度痴呆患者中的结果一般(假阴性率为25%)。结论是,两种筛查工具,尤其是CST简版在临床实践中的价值有限。