Suppr超能文献

[认知筛查测试的项目系列与简易精神状态检查表的项目系列比较]

[Item series of the cognitive screening test compared to those of the mini-mental status examination].

作者信息

Schmand B, Deelman B G, Hooijer C, Jonker C, Lindeboom J

机构信息

AMSTEL-project/Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek (EMGO), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Feb;27(1):29-33.

PMID:8629282
Abstract

The items of the ¿mini-mental state examination' (MMSE) and a Dutch dementia screening instrument, the ¿cognitive screening test' (CST), as well as the ¿geriatric mental status schedule' (GMS) and the ¿Dutch adult reading test' (DART), were administered to 4051 elderly people aged 65 to 84 years. This study was part of the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL-project), which is a population survey of cognitive decline and dementia. Based on the item-pool, CST and MMSE scores were calculated. Both tests were comparable as far as their validity as dementia screeners is concerned (dementia criterion was GMS Organic syndrome, cut-point 2/3). The abbreviated version of the CST (CST-14) has a somewhat lower validity. The reliabilities of the unabbreviated CST (CST-20) and the MMSE are also comparable. The influence of age, education, depression, and premorbid intelligence (DART-IQ) was most notable in the MMSE. Thus, the CST-20 item set has slightly better psychometric properties than the MMSE. A figure is presented by which CST scores can be transformed into MMSE scores.

摘要

对4051名年龄在65至84岁之间的老年人进行了“简易精神状态检查表”(MMSE)、一种荷兰痴呆筛查工具“认知筛查测试”(CST)、“老年精神状态检查表”(GMS)以及“荷兰成人阅读测试”(DART)等项目的测试。本研究是阿姆斯特丹老年人研究(AMSTEL项目)的一部分,该项目是一项关于认知衰退和痴呆的人群调查。基于项目库,计算了CST和MMSE得分。就其作为痴呆筛查工具的有效性而言,这两种测试具有可比性(痴呆标准为GMS器质性综合征,切点为2/3)。CST的简化版(CST - 14)有效性略低。未简化的CST(CST - 20)和MMSE的信度也具有可比性。在MMSE中,年龄、教育程度、抑郁和病前智力(DART - IQ)的影响最为显著。因此,CST - 20项目集的心理测量特性比MMSE略好。给出了一个图表,通过它可以将CST得分转换为MMSE得分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验