Schmand B, Deelman B G, Hooijer C, Jonker C, Lindeboom J
AMSTEL-project/Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek (EMGO), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Feb;27(1):29-33.
The items of the ¿mini-mental state examination' (MMSE) and a Dutch dementia screening instrument, the ¿cognitive screening test' (CST), as well as the ¿geriatric mental status schedule' (GMS) and the ¿Dutch adult reading test' (DART), were administered to 4051 elderly people aged 65 to 84 years. This study was part of the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL-project), which is a population survey of cognitive decline and dementia. Based on the item-pool, CST and MMSE scores were calculated. Both tests were comparable as far as their validity as dementia screeners is concerned (dementia criterion was GMS Organic syndrome, cut-point 2/3). The abbreviated version of the CST (CST-14) has a somewhat lower validity. The reliabilities of the unabbreviated CST (CST-20) and the MMSE are also comparable. The influence of age, education, depression, and premorbid intelligence (DART-IQ) was most notable in the MMSE. Thus, the CST-20 item set has slightly better psychometric properties than the MMSE. A figure is presented by which CST scores can be transformed into MMSE scores.
对4051名年龄在65至84岁之间的老年人进行了“简易精神状态检查表”(MMSE)、一种荷兰痴呆筛查工具“认知筛查测试”(CST)、“老年精神状态检查表”(GMS)以及“荷兰成人阅读测试”(DART)等项目的测试。本研究是阿姆斯特丹老年人研究(AMSTEL项目)的一部分,该项目是一项关于认知衰退和痴呆的人群调查。基于项目库,计算了CST和MMSE得分。就其作为痴呆筛查工具的有效性而言,这两种测试具有可比性(痴呆标准为GMS器质性综合征,切点为2/3)。CST的简化版(CST - 14)有效性略低。未简化的CST(CST - 20)和MMSE的信度也具有可比性。在MMSE中,年龄、教育程度、抑郁和病前智力(DART - IQ)的影响最为显著。因此,CST - 20项目集的心理测量特性比MMSE略好。给出了一个图表,通过它可以将CST得分转换为MMSE得分。