• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文拉法辛缓释剂与传统抗抑郁药治疗既往抗抑郁药治疗失败的抑郁症缓解情况对比:ARGOS研究

Venlafaxine extended release versus conventional antidepressants in the remission of depressive disorders after previous antidepressant failure: ARGOS study.

作者信息

Baldomero E Baca, Ubago J Giner, Cercós C Leal, Ruiloba J Vallejo, Calvo C García, López R Prieto

机构信息

Psychiatry Department, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(2):68-76. doi: 10.1002/da.20080.

DOI:10.1002/da.20080
PMID:16094658
Abstract

Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) may be used as an alternative treatment for depressed patients who do not tolerate or respond adequately to treatment with a conventional antidepressant. This randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the effectiveness of the SNRI venlafaxine extended release (VXR) with that of conventional antidepressants (CA) in patients who were referred to an outpatient psychiatric specialty care setting for treatment after failure to tolerate or respond to at least 4 weeks of treatment with a CA in a primary care setting. Patients with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) score > or =17 were randomly assigned to treatment with an alternative CA or VXR. Remission was defined as a score < or =7 on the HAM-D17. Efficacy analyses were carried out on 3,097 patients from the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (1,632 VXR; 1,465 CA). The antidepressants prescribed most frequently in the CA group were paroxetine (21.3%), citalopram (20.1%), sertraline (19.1%), fluoxetine (17.0%), and mirtazapine (7.9%). After 24 weeks of treatment, the VXR group demonstrated a significantly higher remission rate than did the CA group (59.3% VXR; 51.5% CA; P<.0001; odds ratio: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.19-1.58; P<.01). Despite the limitations of the open design, the results of this study suggest that venlafaxine extended release may be more effective than the conventional antidepressants used in this study when treating depressed patients who do not tolerate or respond adequately to treatment with a conventional antidepressant.

摘要

5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)可作为不能耐受传统抗抑郁药治疗或对其治疗反应欠佳的抑郁症患者的替代治疗方法。这项随机、开放标签、多中心研究比较了在初级保健机构中接受至少4周传统抗抑郁药(CA)治疗后仍不能耐受或反应欠佳而被转诊至门诊精神科专科护理机构治疗的患者中,SNRI文拉法辛缓释剂(VXR)与传统抗抑郁药(CA)的疗效。汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D17)评分≥17分的患者被随机分配接受另一种CA或VXR治疗。缓解定义为HAM-D17评分≤7分。对来自意向性治疗(ITT)人群的3097例患者(1632例VXR;1465例CA)进行了疗效分析。CA组中最常开具的抗抑郁药为帕罗西汀(21.3%)、西酞普兰(20.1%)、舍曲林(19.1%)、氟西汀(17.0%)和米氮平(7.9%)。治疗24周后,VXR组的缓解率显著高于CA组(VXR组为59.3%;CA组为51.5%;P<0.0001;优势比:'1.37;95%CI:1.19-1.58;P<0.01)。尽管本开放设计存在局限性,但本研究结果表明,在治疗不能耐受传统抗抑郁药治疗或对其治疗反应欠佳的抑郁症患者时,文拉法辛缓释剂可能比本研究中使用的传统抗抑郁药更有效。

相似文献

1
Venlafaxine extended release versus conventional antidepressants in the remission of depressive disorders after previous antidepressant failure: ARGOS study.文拉法辛缓释剂与传统抗抑郁药治疗既往抗抑郁药治疗失败的抑郁症缓解情况对比:ARGOS研究
Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(2):68-76. doi: 10.1002/da.20080.
2
Comparisons of the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study in a Chinese population.比较文拉法辛缓释剂、米氮平、帕罗西汀治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效和耐受性:一项中国人群双盲、随机、先导研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;30(4):357-64. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181e7784f.
3
Depression in primary care: effectiveness of venlafaxine extended-release in elderly patients; Observational study.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2003.11.001.
4
Effectiveness and safety of venlafaxine extended release in elderly depressed patients.文拉法辛缓释剂在老年抑郁症患者中的有效性及安全性
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 May-Jun;46(3):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
5
Venlafaxine extended-release in patients older than 80 years with depressive syndrome.80岁以上患有抑郁综合征患者的缓释文拉法辛
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;21(4):337-43. doi: 10.1002/gps.1468.
6
Dual-dual action? Combining venlafaxine and mirtazapine in the treatment of depression.双重双重作用?文拉法辛与米氮平联合治疗抑郁症。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;42(4):346-9. doi: 10.1080/00048670701881587.
7
[Gender differences in clinical profile, response and remission of depressive patients treated with venlafaxine extended release].[接受文拉法辛缓释片治疗的抑郁症患者在临床特征、反应及缓解方面的性别差异]
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2008 Mar-Apr;36(2):82-9.
8
[Effectiveness of venlafaxine extended release and conventional antidepressants in elderly patients with depressive disorder].
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2006 May-Jun;34(3):153-61.
9
A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine treatment in depressed outpatients.文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲、安慰剂对照比较
J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;41(3-4):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
10
A randomized, double-blind comparison of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀与文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症患者的随机双盲对照研究
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jan;42(1):22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Therapeutics for Treatment-Resistant Depression in the Older Adult.老年治疗抵抗性抑郁症的治疗方法综述。
Drugs Aging. 2023 Sep;40(9):785-813. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01051-3. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD010557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010557.pub2.
3
Challenging Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder: A Roadmap for Improved Therapeutics.挑战难治性重度抑郁症:改善治疗方法的路线图。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13(5):616-35. doi: 10.2174/1570159x13666150630173522.
4
Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: Evidences and personal experience.药物治疗抵抗性抑郁症的方法:证据和个人经验。
World J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 22;5(3):330-41. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.330.
5
Dilemma of prescribing aripiprazole under the Taiwan health insurance program: a descriptive study.台湾健康保险计划下开具阿立哌唑的困境:一项描述性研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Jan 27;11:225-32. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S75609. eCollection 2015.
6
Efficacy and safety of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination vs fluoxetine monotherapy following successful combination therapy of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.难治性重度抑郁症联合治疗成功后,奥氮平/氟西汀联合用药与氟西汀单药治疗的疗效和安全性比较
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Oct;39(11):2549-59. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.101. Epub 2014 May 7.
7
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型的抑郁症药物治疗对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3.
8
Combining a dopamine agonist and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study.联合多巴胺激动剂和选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症:一项双盲、随机先导研究。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
9
Potential to enhance the prescribing of generic drugs in patients with mental health problems in austria; implications for the future.奥地利提高精神健康问题患者开处仿制药处方的潜力;对未来的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2013 Jan 7;3:198. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00198. eCollection 2012.
10
How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?基层医生应该如何选择要使用的抗抑郁药?
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):360-9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0283-x.