Antonio Tundo, Rocco de Filippis, Luca Proietti, Istituto di Psicopatologia, Private Outpatients Clinic, 00196 Roma, Italy.
World J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 22;5(3):330-41. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.330.
To review evidence supporting pharmacological treatments for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and to discuss them according to personal clinical experience.
Original studies, clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses addressing pharmacological treatment for TRD in adult patients published from 1990 to 2013 were identified by data base queries (PubMed, Google Scholar e Quertle Searches) using terms: "treatment resistant depression", "treatment refractory depression", "partial response depression", "non responder depression", "optimization strategy", "switching strategy", "combination strategy", "augmentation strategy", selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors antidepressants (SSRI), tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors antidepressants, mirtazapine, mianserine, bupropione, monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressant (MAOI), lithium, thyroid hormones, second generation antipsychotics (SGA), dopamine agonists, lamotrigine, psychostimulants, dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, ketamine, omega-3 fatty acids, S-adenosil-L-metionine, methylfolat, pindolol, sex steroids, glucocorticoid agents. Other citations of interest were further identified from references reported in the accessed articles. Selected publications were grouped by treatment strategy: (1) switching from an ineffective antidepressant (AD) to a new AD from a similar or different class; (2) combining the current AD regimen with a second AD from a different class; and (3) augmenting the current AD regimen with a second agent not thought to be an antidepressant itself.
Switching from a TCA to another TCA provides only a modest advantage (response rate 9%-27%), while switching from a SSRI to another SSRI is more advantageous (response rate up to 75%). Evidence supports the usefulness of switching from SSRI to venlafaxine (5 positive trials out 6), TCA (2 positive trials out 3), and MAOI (2 positive trials out 2) but not from SSRI to bupropione, duloxetine and mirtazapine. Three reviews demonstrated that the benefits of intra- and cross-class switch do not significantly differ. Data on combination strategy are controversial regarding TCA-SSRI combination (positive results in old studies, negative in more recent study) and bupropion-SSRI combination (three open series studies but not three controlled trails support the useful of this combination) and positive regard mirtazapine (or its analogue mianserine) combination with ADs of different classes. As regards the augmentation strategy, available evidences supported the efficacy of TCA augmentation with lithium salts and thyroid hormone (T3), but are conflicting regard the SSRI augmentation with these two drugs (1 positive trial out of 4 for lithium and 3 out of 5 for thyroid hormone). Double-blind controlled studies showed the efficacy of AD augmentation with aripiprazole (5 positive trials out 5), quetiapine (3 positive trials out 3) and, at less extent, of fluoxetine augmentation with olanzapine (3 positive trials out 6), so these drugs received the FDA indication for the acute treatment of TRD. Results on AD augmentation with risperidone are conflicting (2 short term positive trials, 1 short-term and 1 long-term negative trials). Case series and open-label trials showed that AD augmentation with pramipexole or ropinirole, two dopamine agonists, could be an effective treatment for TRD (response rate to pramipexole 48%-74%, to ropinirole 40%-44%) although one recent double-blind placebo-controlled study does not support the superiority of pramipexole over placebo. Evidences do not justify the use of psychostimulants, omega-3 fatty acids, S-adenosil-L-metionine, methylfolate, pindolol, lamotrigine, and sex hormone as AD augmentation for TRD. Combining the available evidences with our experience we suggest treating non-responders to one SSRI bupropion or mirtazapine trial by switching to venlafaxine, and non-responders to one venlafaxine trial by switching to a TCA or, if TCA are not tolerated, combining mirtazapine with SSRI or venlafaxine. In non-responders to two or more ADs (including at least one TCA if tolerated) current AD regimen could be augmented with lithium salts (mainly in patients with bipolar depression or suicidality), SGAs (mostly aripiprazole) or DA-agonists (mostly pramipexole). In patients with severe TRD, i.e., non-responders to combination and augmentation strategies as well as to electroconvulsive therapy if workable, we suggest to try a combination plus augmentation strategy.
Our study identifies alternative effective treatment strategies for TRD. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy of different strategies in more homogeneous subpopulations.
回顾支持治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)的药物治疗的证据,并根据个人临床经验进行讨论。
通过数据库查询(PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Quertle Searches),使用术语“治疗抵抗性抑郁症”、“治疗难治性抑郁症”、“部分反应性抑郁症”、“无反应性抑郁症”、“优化策略”、“转换策略”、“联合策略”、“增效策略”、“选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂抗抑郁药(SSRI)”、“三环抗抑郁药(TCA)”、“5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂抗抑郁药”、“米氮平”、“米安色林”、“安非他酮”、“单胺氧化酶抑制剂抗抑郁药(MAOI)”、“锂”、“甲状腺激素”、“第二代抗精神病药(SGA)”、“多巴胺激动剂”、“拉莫三嗪”、“精神兴奋剂”、“右美沙芬”、“右啡烷”、“氯胺酮”、“ω-3 脂肪酸”、“S-腺苷-L-甲硫氨酸”、“甲硫氨酸”、“pindolol”、“性激素”、“糖皮质激素”,检索了 1990 年至 2013 年发表的针对成年患者 TRD 的药物治疗的原始研究、临床试验、系统评价和荟萃分析。从访问文章中报告的参考文献中进一步确定了其他感兴趣的引文。选择的出版物按治疗策略分组:(1)从类似或不同类别的新 AD 中转换无效的 AD;(2)将当前 AD 方案与来自不同类别的第二种 AD 联合;(3)用认为本身不是抗抑郁药的第二种药物增强当前 AD 方案。
从 TCA 转换到另一种 TCA 仅提供适度的优势(反应率 9%-27%),而从 SSRI 转换到另一种 SSRI 则更有利(反应率高达 75%)。有证据表明从 SSRI 转换到文拉法辛(5 项阳性试验中有 6 项)、TCA(3 项阳性试验中有 2 项)和 MAOI(2 项阳性试验中有 2 项)是有用的,但从 SSRI 转换到安非他酮、度洛西汀和米氮平则不然。三项综述表明,内类和跨类转换的益处没有显著差异。关于联合策略的数据对于 TCA-SSRI 联合(旧研究中阳性结果,最近研究中阴性结果)和安非他酮-SSRI 联合(三项开放系列研究但三项对照试验不支持这种联合)存在争议,而米氮平(或其类似物米安色林)与不同类别的 AD 联合则存在阳性结果。关于增效策略,现有的证据支持 TCA 增效与锂盐和甲状腺激素(T3)的疗效,但对 SSRI 增效与这两种药物的疗效存在争议(锂盐有 1 项阳性试验,甲状腺激素有 4 项阳性试验)。双盲对照研究显示阿立哌唑(5 项阳性试验中有 5 项)、喹硫平(3 项阳性试验中有 3 项)增效抗抑郁治疗的疗效,在较小程度上,氟西汀增效与奥氮平(6 项阳性试验中有 3 项)增效抗抑郁治疗的疗效,这些药物获得了 FDA 对急性治疗 TRD 的批准。阿立哌唑增效的结果存在争议(2 项短期阳性试验,1 项短期和 1 项长期阴性试验)。病例系列和开放标签试验表明,阿立哌唑或罗匹尼罗增效,两种多巴胺激动剂,可能是治疗 TRD 的有效方法(反应率为普拉克索 48%-74%,罗匹尼罗 40%-44%),尽管最近的一项双盲安慰剂对照研究不支持普拉克索优于安慰剂。没有证据支持使用精神兴奋剂、ω-3 脂肪酸、S-腺苷-L-甲硫氨酸、甲硫氨酸、pindolol、拉莫三嗪和性激素作为 TRD 的增效治疗。将现有证据与我们的经验相结合,我们建议对一种 SSRI 安非他酮或米氮平试验无反应的患者,换用文拉法辛,对文拉法辛试验无反应的患者,换用 TCA 或,如果不能耐受 TCA,则将米氮平与 SSRI 或文拉法辛联合。对两种或两种以上 AD 无反应(如果耐受,至少包括一种 TCA)的患者,目前的 AD 方案可与锂盐(主要是双相抑郁或有自杀倾向的患者)、SGA(主要是阿立哌唑)或 DA 激动剂(主要是普拉克索)增效。对于严重的 TRD 患者,即联合增效策略以及电惊厥治疗(如果可行)均无效的患者,我们建议尝试联合增效策略。
我们的研究确定了治疗 TRD 的替代有效治疗策略。需要进一步研究比较不同策略在更同质的亚群中的疗效。