• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[非罪犯血管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能否改善并发泵衰竭的急性心肌梗死的预后?]

[Does percutaneous coronary intervention in non-culprit vessels improve the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction complicated by pump failure?].

作者信息

Katayama Naoyuki, Horiuchi Kenji, Nakao Koichi, Kasanuki Hiroshi, Honda Takashi

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2005 Jul;46(1):1-8.

PMID:16095225
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)in non-culprit vessel lesions improves the short-term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction complicated by pump failure.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with acute myocardial infarction in hemodynamic subset 4 of Forrester's classification at hospitalization underwent PCI for multiple vessel lesions within 12 hr (6.1 +/- 3.4 hr) of the onset of acute myocardial infarction. No patients had left main trunk lesion. Twenty patients also underwent PCI for non-culprit vessel lesions (multivessel PCI group: M-PCI), but the remaining 36 did not (culprit vessel PCI group: C-PCI). The in-hospital prognosis was investigated from the hospital records.

RESULTS

Complete revascularization was accomplished in 18 patients(90%)in the M-PCI. The rates of all in-hospital death were almost equivalent in both groups (M-PCI 30% vs C-PCI 42%, p = 0.21), but the rate of cardiac deaths was higher in the C-PCI than in the M-PCI (42% vs 15%, p < 0.05). Overall major adverse cardiac events occurred more often in the C-PCI than in the M-PCI(58% vs 25%, p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed complete revascularization(odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.95, p < 0.05)and duration from onset of acute myocardial infarction to PCI < 6 hr (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.98, p < 0.05) were negative predictors of in-hospital cardiac death, and prior myocardial infarction (odds ratio 4.97, 95% confidence interval 1.09-22.67, p < 0.05) was a positive predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI of non-culprit vessel lesions might improve the short-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction and pump failure.

摘要

目的

评估对非罪犯血管病变进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是否能改善并发泵衰竭的急性心肌梗死患者的短期预后。

方法

56例住院时处于Forrester分类血流动力学亚组4的急性心肌梗死患者在急性心肌梗死发病后12小时内(6.1±3.4小时)对多支血管病变进行了PCI。无患者有左主干病变。20例患者还对非罪犯血管病变进行了PCI(多支血管PCI组:M-PCI),但其余36例未进行(罪犯血管PCI组:C-PCI)。从医院记录中调查住院期间的预后情况。

结果

M-PCI组18例患者(90%)实现了完全血运重建。两组的院内总死亡率几乎相当(M-PCI组30% vs C-PCI组42%,p = 0.21),但C-PCI组的心脏死亡率高于M-PCI组(42% vs 15%,p < 0.05)。总体主要不良心脏事件在C-PCI组比M-PCI组更常发生(58% vs 25%,p < 0.05)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,完全血运重建(比值比0.11,95%置信区间0.02 - 0.95,p < 0.05)以及急性心肌梗死发病至PCI的时间<6小时(比值比0.25,95%置信区间0.06 - 0.98,p < 0.05)是院内心脏死亡的负性预测因素,而既往心肌梗死(比值比4.97,95%置信区间1.09 - 22.67,p < 0.05)是正性预测因素。

结论

对非罪犯血管病变进行PCI可能改善急性心肌梗死并发泵衰竭患者的短期预后。

相似文献

1
[Does percutaneous coronary intervention in non-culprit vessels improve the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction complicated by pump failure?].[非罪犯血管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能否改善并发泵衰竭的急性心肌梗死的预后?]
J Cardiol. 2005 Jul;46(1):1-8.
2
Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间罪犯血管单独处理与完全冠状动脉血运重建的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 24;123(3):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
3
Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction.多支血管病变和急性心肌梗死患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Am Heart J. 2004 Sep;148(3):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.051.
4
Impact of admission creatinine level on clinical outcomes of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation.入院时肌酐水平对接受药物洗脱支架植入的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Dec 5;121(23):2379-83.
5
[Early initiation of statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention].[急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功后他汀类药物治疗的早期启动]
J Cardiol. 2004 Oct;44(4):131-40.
6
Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.多支血管病变对急性心肌梗死接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者再灌注成功率及临床结局的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(14):1709-16. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm184. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
7
In-hospital and long-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后多支血管经皮冠状动脉血运重建的院内及长期预后
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;95(3):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.032.
8
Importance of complex additional stenosis after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in medium-term prognosis.急性心肌梗死初次血管成形术后复杂附加狭窄对中期预后的重要性。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Jun;23(6):853-64.
9
Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: a randomized comparison.多支血管病变中完全血运重建与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机对照研究
Am Heart J. 2004 Sep;148(3):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.026.
10
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行血运重建的比较
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;11(4):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1419-5. Epub 2016 Mar 7.