• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳酸阈估计方法的比较

A comparison of methods for estimating the lactate threshold.

作者信息

McGehee James C, Tanner Charles J, Houmard Joseph A

机构信息

Department of Exercise and Sport Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Aug;19(3):553-8. doi: 10.1519/15444.1.

DOI:10.1519/15444.1
PMID:16095403
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of tests that may be used by distance runners to estimate the lactate threshold. Competitive distance runners/triathletes (N = 27) performed a criterion test that directly measured (blood lactate of 4.0 mmol.L(-1)) the lactate threshold. Subjects then performed 4 tests (VDOT, 3,200-m time trial, 30-minute time trial, Conconi) that estimate the threshold. Mean estimations of the running velocity at the lactate threshold from the 30-minute time trial (standard error of the estimate, SEE, 0.21 m.s(-1)) and VDOT (SEE 0.41 m.s(-1)) methods did not differ (P>0.05) from the criterion. In terms of heart rate, the 30-minute time trial estimation did not significantly differ (SEE 8.0 b.min(-1)) from criterion. These findings suggest that the 30-minute time-trial method should be considered by coaches and distance runners/triathletes as a method for estimating both the running velocity and heart rate at the lactate threshold.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验长跑运动员用于估计乳酸阈的测试的准确性。竞技长跑运动员/铁人三项运动员(N = 27)进行了一项标准测试,该测试直接测量(血乳酸为4.0 mmol.L(-1))乳酸阈。受试者随后进行了4项估计乳酸阈的测试(VDOT、3200米计时赛、30分钟计时赛、康科尼测试)。30分钟计时赛(估计标准误差,SEE,0.21 m.s(-1))和VDOT(SEE 0.41 m.s(-1))方法对乳酸阈时跑步速度的平均估计与标准测试结果无差异(P>0.05)。就心率而言,30分钟计时赛的估计与标准测试结果无显著差异(SEE 8.0 b.min(-1))。这些发现表明,教练和长跑运动员/铁人三项运动员应将30分钟计时赛方法视为一种估计乳酸阈时跑步速度和心率的方法。

相似文献

1
A comparison of methods for estimating the lactate threshold.乳酸阈估计方法的比较
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Aug;19(3):553-8. doi: 10.1519/15444.1.
2
The Conconi test in not valid for estimation of the lactate turnpoint in runners.康科尼测试对于估算跑步者的乳酸阈并不有效。
J Sports Sci. 1997 Aug;15(4):385-94. doi: 10.1080/026404197367173.
3
Off seasonal and pre-seasonal assessment of circulating energy sources during prolonged running at the anaerobic threshold in competitive triathletes.对竞技铁人三项运动员在无氧阈强度下长时间跑步过程中循环能源的非赛季和赛季前评估。
Br J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;38(4):402-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.003442.
4
Relationships and significance of lactate minimum, critical velocity, heart rate deflection and 3 000 m track-tests for running.跑步时乳酸最低值、临界速度、心率偏移与3000米跑道测试之间的关系及意义。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Dec;45(4):441-51.
5
Blood lactate removal during recovery at various intensities below the individual anaerobic threshold in triathletes.铁人三项运动员在低于个体无氧阈的不同强度恢复过程中血乳酸的清除情况。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Dec;45(4):460-6.
6
Comparison of maximal anaerobic running tests on a treadmill and track.跑步机和跑道上最大无氧跑测试的比较。
J Sports Sci. 2007 Jan 1;25(1):87-96. doi: 10.1080/02640410500497717.
7
Higher Accuracy of the Lactate Minimum Test Compared to Established Threshold Concepts to Determine Maximal Lactate Steady State in Running.与既定阈值概念相比,乳酸最低测试在确定跑步最大乳酸稳态方面具有更高的准确性。
Int J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;39(7):541-548. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-102131. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Post-analysis methods for lactate threshold depend on training intensity and aerobic capacity in runners. An experimental laboratory study.乳酸阈值的分析后方法取决于跑步者的训练强度和有氧能力。一项实验性实验室研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Nov 13;134(3):193-8. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.8921512.
9
Prediction of lactate threshold using the modified Conconi test in distance runners.使用改良康科尼测试预测长跑运动员的乳酸阈
Physiol Int. 2016 Jun 1;103(2):262-270. doi: 10.1556/036.103.2016.2.12.
10
Effects of a concurrent strength and endurance training on running performance and running economy in recreational marathon runners.抗阻和耐力训练对大众马拉松跑者跑步表现和跑步经济性的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Oct;24(10):2770-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d64e9c.

引用本文的文献

1
Longer Work/Rest Intervals During High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Lead to Elevated Levels of miR-222 and miR-29c.高强度间歇训练(HIIT)期间延长工作/休息间隔会导致miR-222和miR-29c水平升高。
Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 17;9:395. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00395. eCollection 2018.
2
Effect of Endurance Training on The Lactate and Glucose Minimum Intensities.耐力训练对乳酸和葡萄糖最低强度的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 Mar 1;17(1):117-123. eCollection 2018 Mar.
3
Dose-Response of High-Intensity Training (HIT) on Atheroprotective miRNA-126 Levels.
高强度训练(HIT)对具有抗动脉粥样硬化作用的微小RNA-126水平的剂量反应。
Front Physiol. 2017 May 30;8:349. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00349. eCollection 2017.
4
Post-analysis methods for lactate threshold depend on training intensity and aerobic capacity in runners. An experimental laboratory study.乳酸阈值的分析后方法取决于跑步者的训练强度和有氧能力。一项实验性实验室研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Nov 13;134(3):193-8. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.8921512.
5
Workload during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏期间的工作量。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Feb;88(2):175-84. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0948-3. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Lactate threshold predicting time-trial performance: impact of heat and acclimation.乳酸阈预测计时赛表现:热适应的影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Jul;111(1):221-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00334.2011. Epub 2011 Apr 28.