Schrappe Matthias
Klinikum der Philipps-Universität, Marburg.
Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Aug 15;100(8):478-85. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1061.
Patient safety is the latest issue in the present stage of the German health care system, characterized by costs and quality both resulting in value of care. Patient safety defined as "absence of adverse events" represents an important problem, because 10% of in-house patients experience an adverse event, which in nearly 50% of the cases is due to an error (preventable adverse event). Threats and near misses are errors without a consecutive adverse event, much more common and better to integrate in the concept of risk management, which is based on thorough analysis and prevention of errors in medicine. Chart reviews show adverse events in between 3% and 11% of hospital patients, studies with direct observation result in higher estimates (17.7%). Nosocomial infections occur in 3-5%, adverse drug events in 0.17-6.5%, and adverse medical device events in up to 8% of patients. Medication errors (ordering, dosing, distribution) are present in up to 50% of all drug applications. Adverse drug events are important reasons for hospital admissions (3.2-10.8% of all admitted patients), other consequences of adverse drug events are severe disability and death. Mortality of adverse drug events is estimated between 0.04% and 0.95% of all patients. The introduction of risk management in the German health care system is one option to prevent a malpractice crisis similar to the situation in the US health care system in the 1990s. Errors are not to be considered only individual but also organizational failures. Critical incident report systems (CIRS) can help to increase the knowledge about errors, near misses and adverse events, so that prevention of errors can take place. On the organizational level, it is an issue of leaderchip to convince the members of the organization that prevention of errors has a higher priority than punishing and blaming. The medical and other professions, on the other side, have to change their self-understanding from the zero mistake philosophy to accepting errors as common events. This understanding is a prerequisite that analysis can be performed. The participation of patients should be strengthened, because public disclosure is an important issue, although the scientific evidence for real improvement in health care resulting from public disclosure is still inconclusive.
患者安全是德国医疗体系现阶段的最新议题,其特点是成本和质量都能产生医疗价值。将患者安全定义为“无不良事件”是一个重要问题,因为10%的住院患者会经历不良事件,其中近50%的情况是由错误(可预防的不良事件)导致的。威胁和险兆是没有后续不良事件的错误,更为常见,且更适合纳入基于对医疗错误进行全面分析和预防的风险管理概念。病历审查显示,3%至11%的住院患者存在不良事件,直接观察研究得出的估计值更高(17.7%)。医院感染发生率为3%至5%,药物不良事件发生率为0.17%至6.5%,医疗设备不良事件发生率高达8%的患者。在所有药物应用中,高达50%存在用药错误(医嘱、剂量、分发)。药物不良事件是住院的重要原因(占所有入院患者的3.2%至10.8%),药物不良事件的其他后果包括严重残疾和死亡。药物不良事件导致的死亡率估计占所有患者的0.04%至0.95%。在德国医疗体系中引入风险管理是预防类似美国20世纪90年代医疗体系中出现的医疗事故危机的一种选择。错误不应仅被视为个人失误,还应被视为组织失误。关键事件报告系统(CIRS)有助于增加对错误、险兆和不良事件的了解,从而实现错误预防。在组织层面,领导者的职责是让组织成员相信预防错误比惩罚和指责更重要。另一方面,医疗及其他行业必须从零失误理念转变为将错误视为常见事件的自我认知。这种认知是能够进行分析的前提条件。应加强患者的参与,因为公开披露是一个重要问题,尽管公开披露能真正改善医疗保健的科学证据仍不确凿。