• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

霍利奥克共依存指数的验证。

Validation of the holyoake codependency index.

作者信息

Dear Greg E, Roberts Clare M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2005 Jul;139(4):293-313. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.4.293-314.

DOI:10.3200/JRLP.139.4.293-314
PMID:16097271
Abstract

Some clinicians working with families with alcohol or other drug problems continue to use the codependency model to guide their practice despite the limited empirical support for this approach. Research into codependency has been hampered by the lack of psychometrically sound instruments. The Holyoake Codependency Index (HCI; G. E. Dear & C. M. Roberts, 2000) is a 13-item self-report measure of codependent traits that has previously shown adequate to high reliability, initial evidence of construct validity, and an internal structure that is consistent across samples. In the 4 studies reported here, the internal structure of the HCI was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis, and further evidence of construct validity was found in that the HCI subscales showed meaningful associations with other psychological and demographic variables.

摘要

一些为有酒精或其他药物问题的家庭提供服务的临床医生,尽管这种方法得到的实证支持有限,但仍继续使用相互依赖模型来指导他们的实践。由于缺乏心理测量学上可靠的工具,对相互依赖的研究受到了阻碍。霍利奥克相互依赖指数(HCI;G.E.迪尔和C.M.罗伯茨,2000)是一项由13个项目组成的自我报告测量工具,用于测量相互依赖特质,此前已显示出足够高的信度、初步的结构效度证据,以及跨样本一致的内部结构。在本文报道的4项研究中,通过验证性因素分析证实了HCI的内部结构,并且发现了进一步的结构效度证据,即HCI分量表与其他心理和人口统计学变量显示出有意义的关联。

相似文献

1
Validation of the holyoake codependency index.霍利奥克共依存指数的验证。
J Psychol. 2005 Jul;139(4):293-313. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.4.293-314.
2
The Holyoake Codependency Index: further evidence of factorial validity.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2002 Mar;21(1):47-52. doi: 10.1080/09595230220119354.
3
The Holyoake Codependency Index: investigation of the factor structure and psychometric properties.
Psychol Rep. 2000 Dec;87(3 Pt 1):991-1002. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.991.
4
Nurse codependency: instrument development and validation.
J Nurs Meas. 2004 Spring-Summer;12(1):63-75.
5
Test-retest reliability of the Holyoake Codependency Index with Australian students.霍利约克共依存指数在澳大利亚学生中的重测信度。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Apr;94(2):482-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.2.482-484.
6
Reassessing the codependency movement: a response to Sorrentino.
Health Care Manage Rev. 1994 Winter;19(1):7-10.
7
Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.社交焦虑与对负面评价的恐惧:BFNE-II的结构效度
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 3.
8
Family stressors as predictors of codependency.作为相互依赖预测因素的家庭压力源
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2000 Feb;126(1):5-22.
9
Psychometric properties of the Turkish form of Codependency Assessment Tool.《依赖症评估工具土耳其语版的心理测量学特性》。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2009 Dec;23(6):441-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2008.10.004.
10
A critical analysis of the concept of codependency.对相互依赖概念的批判性分析。
Soc Work. 1994 Nov;39(6):677-85.

引用本文的文献

1
[Family factors associated with co-dependency in nurses at a hospital in Cancun, Quintana Roo, México].[墨西哥金塔纳罗奥州坎昆市一家医院护士中与相互依赖相关的家庭因素]
Aten Primaria. 2014 May;46(5):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Mar 1.