• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHOP方案与CIOP方案治疗组织学类型侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤且预后良好的年轻患者的比较。

Comparison of CHOP versus CIOP in good prognosis younger patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

作者信息

Burton C, Smith P, Vaughan-Hudson G, Qian W, Hoskin P, Cunningham D, Hancock B, Linch D

机构信息

Lymphoma Trials Office, University College London and CRUK Clinical Trials Centre, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2005 Aug;130(4):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05640.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05640.x
PMID:16098067
Abstract

CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) has been the standard chemotherapy regimen used for diffuse large cell lymphomas for over 30 years. Idarubicin is a 4-demethoxy-anthracycline analogue of daunorubicin that has proven activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and has been reported to cause less cardiotoxicity. We therefore initiated a randomised trial of standard dose CHOP versus CIOP (cyclophosphamide, idarubicin, vincristine and prednisolone), in which doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 was substituted by idarubicin 10 mg/m2, a dose thought to have equivalent anti-lymphoma activity. This trial was closed prematurely after 211 patients had completed therapy when a lower complete remission (CR) rate was noted in the CIOP arm. The formal results with long-term follow up are now reported. Overall response rate was 84% in the CHOP arm and 78% in the CIOP arm, CR rates were 70% and 52% respectively in all patients (P=0.013) and 73% and 52% respectively for the eligible patients (P=0.0084). At a median of 8 years follow-up, 4-year progression-free survival for all patients was 56% in the CHOP arm and 40% in the CIOP arm (P=0.0096). Overall survival for all patients was 65% in the CHOP arm and 56% in the CIOP arm (P=0.14). Results for eligible patients were comparable. CIOP containing idarubicin at a dose of 10 mg/m2 is clearly inferior to standard CHOP.

摘要

CHOP(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松龙)30多年来一直是用于弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤的标准化疗方案。伊达比星是柔红霉素的4-去甲氧基蒽环类类似物,已证实其在非霍奇金淋巴瘤中具有活性,并且据报道其心脏毒性较小。因此,我们开展了一项标准剂量CHOP与CIOP(环磷酰胺、伊达比星、长春新碱和泼尼松龙)的随机试验,其中用10mg/m²的伊达比星替代50mg/m²的阿霉素,该剂量被认为具有等效的抗淋巴瘤活性。在211例患者完成治疗后,该试验提前结束,当时发现CIOP组的完全缓解(CR)率较低。现将长期随访的正式结果报告如下。CHOP组的总缓解率为84%,CIOP组为78%;所有患者的CR率分别为70%和52%(P=0.013),符合条件的患者分别为73%和52%(P=0.0084)。在中位8年的随访中,所有患者的4年无进展生存率在CHOP组为56%,在CIOP组为40%(P=0.0096)。所有患者的总生存率在CHOP组为65%,在CIOP组为56%(P=0.14)。符合条件患者的结果相似。含10mg/m²伊达比星的CIOP明显劣于标准CHOP。

相似文献

1
Comparison of CHOP versus CIOP in good prognosis younger patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.CHOP方案与CIOP方案治疗组织学类型侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤且预后良好的年轻患者的比较。
Br J Haematol. 2005 Aug;130(4):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05640.x.
2
Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.剂量递增的环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)方案联合依托泊苷(超大剂量CHOEP)4个疗程与6个疗程以及自体干细胞移植:早期剂量强度对治疗预后不良的年轻侵袭性淋巴瘤患者至关重要。
Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):136-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21588.
3
P-CHOP: cisplatin (P) added to the standard CHOP regimen as first-line treatment for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-institution phase II study.P-CHOP方案:顺铂(P)添加至标准CHOP方案作为侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的一线治疗:一项单机构II期研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec;26(6):535-42. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000037110.25789.62.
4
Final analysis of the UKLG LY02 trial comparing 6-8 cycles of CHOP with 3 cycles of CHOP followed by a BEAM autograft in patients <65 years with poor prognosis histologically aggressive NHL.英国淋巴瘤研究组 LY02 试验的最终分析:比较 6-8 个周期 CHOP 方案与 3 个周期 CHOP 方案后 BEAM 自体移植治疗组织学上侵袭性 NHL 预后不良<65 岁患者。
Br J Haematol. 2010 Apr;149(2):237-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08081.x. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
5
Dose-intense chemotherapy every 2 weeks with dose-intense cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone may improve survival in intermediate- and high-grade lymphoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9349).每2周进行一次剂量密集化疗,使用剂量密集的环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和强的松,可能会提高中高度淋巴瘤患者的生存率:西南肿瘤协作组的一项II期研究(SWOG 9349)。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 1;21(13):2466-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.137.
6
Dose-dense therapy improves survival in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.剂量密集疗法可提高侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的生存率。
Ann Hematol. 2010 Mar;89(3):273-82. doi: 10.1007/s00277-009-0811-x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
7
Treatment results of chemoradiation therapy for localized aggressive lymphomas: A retrospective 20-year study.局限性侵袭性淋巴瘤的放化疗治疗结果:一项20年回顾性研究。
Ann Hematol. 2006 Aug;85(8):523-9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-006-0114-4. Epub 2006 May 12.
8
Phase III comparative trial using CHOP vs CIOP in the treatment of advanced intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.使用CHOP方案与CIOP方案治疗晚期中级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的III期对照试验。
Leuk Lymphoma. 1995 Oct;19(3-4):329-35. doi: 10.3109/10428199509107906.
9
CHOP compared with CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中CHOP方案与CHOP联合粒细胞集落刺激因子方案的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3041-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.076.
10
[Comparison between R-CHOP regimen and CHOP regimen in treating naive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China--a multi-center randomized trail].中国R-CHOP方案与CHOP方案治疗初治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的比较——一项多中心随机试验
Ai Zheng. 2005 Dec;24(12):1421-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic and epigenetic determinants of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的遗传和表观遗传决定因素。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):123. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00389-w.
2
Significant dose Escalation of Idarubicin in the treatment of aggressive Non- Hodgkin Lymphoma leads to increased hematotoxicity without improvement in efficacy in comparison to standard CHOEP-14: 9-year follow up results of the CIVEP trial of the DSHNHL.与标准CHOEP - 14方案相比,伊达比星在侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗中显著增加剂量会导致血液毒性增加且疗效未改善:DSHNHL的CIVEP试验9年随访结果
Springerplus. 2014 Jan 3;3:5. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-5.
3
Identification of potential surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials of aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: correlation of complete response, time-to-event and overall survival end points.
侵袭性和惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤随机临床试验中潜在替代终点的鉴定:完全缓解、时间相关终点和总生存终点的相关性。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jun;22(6):1392-1403. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq615. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
4
Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients.用于降低癌症患者心脏毒性的不同蒽环类衍生物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;2010(5):CD005006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005006.pub4.
5
Anthracyline-reduced sequential combination chemotherapy for younger patients with good-prognosis aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.蒽环类药物减量序贯联合化疗用于预后良好的年轻侵袭性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar;135(3):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00432-008-0467-2. Epub 2008 Aug 29.