• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups.“利用系统”。通过合作实现变革:对癌症合作组织的评估
Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):210-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x.
2
Interprofessional collaboration with service users in the development of cancer services: the Cancer Partnership Project.癌症服务发展中与服务使用者的跨专业合作:癌症伙伴关系项目。
J Interprof Care. 2006 Jan;20(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/13561820500515304.
3
From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.从言辞到现实:让患者声音融入癌症支持性护理规划
Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):195-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00334.x.
4
Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: availability, characteristics and presentation.英格兰癌症网络管理的比较指标:可及性、特征与呈现
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 27;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-45.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
6
'Calling executives and clinicians to account': user involvement in commissioning cancer services.“要求管理人员和临床医生负责”:用户参与癌症服务的委托工作
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):504-15. doi: 10.1111/hex.12051. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
7
Developing cancer services strategy in primary care in England: primary care trust managers' views of the primary care cancer leads initiative.在英国基层医疗中制定癌症服务策略:基层医疗信托管理人员对基层医疗癌症牵头计划的看法
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(2-3):140-9. doi: 10.1108/14777260610661538.
8
Exploring the influence of service user involvement on health and social care services for cancer.探索服务使用者参与对癌症的健康和社会关怀服务的影响。
Health Expect. 2011 Mar;14(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00620.x.
9
A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs.一项关于有言语、语言和沟通需求儿童的跨专业协作共同实践社会资本的定性案例研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):514-527. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12296. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Calman-Hine reassessed: a survey of cancer network development in England, 1999-2000.卡尔曼-海因再评估:1999 - 2000年英格兰癌症网络发展调查
J Eval Clin Pract. 2002 Aug;8(3):303-11; discussion 299-301. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00350.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
2
Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review.患者和照护者在姑息治疗研究中的参与:综合定性证据综合评价综述。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):969-984. doi: 10.1177/0269216319858247. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
The impact of patient advisors on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review.患者顾问对医疗保健结果的影响:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2630-4.
4
Perceptions of success of a local UK public health collaborative†.英国地方公共卫生合作的成功认知。
Health Promot Int. 2017 Feb 1;32(1):102-112. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav088.
5
Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies.欧盟医院中患者或其代表参与质量管理职能:实施情况及其对以患者为中心的护理策略的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):81-91. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu022. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
6
Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.服务使用者参与癌症护理:对服务使用者的影响。
Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):159-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00627.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
7
Exploring the influence of service user involvement on health and social care services for cancer.探索服务使用者参与对癌症的健康和社会关怀服务的影响。
Health Expect. 2011 Mar;14(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00620.x.
8
Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world.革命还是演进:在消费主义世界中构思患者及公众参与所面临的挑战
Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):275-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x.
9
Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: availability, characteristics and presentation.英格兰癌症网络管理的比较指标:可及性、特征与呈现
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 27;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-45.

本文引用的文献

1
Public involvement in health care.公众参与医疗保健。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 17;328(7432):159-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.159.
2
Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care.关于让患者参与医疗保健规划与发展的系统评价。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263.
3
User involvement and the NHS reforms.患者参与与国民医疗服务体系改革
Health Expect. 1998 Nov;1(2):73-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00021.x.

“利用系统”。通过合作实现变革:对癌症合作组织的评估

'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups.

作者信息

Richardson Alison, Sitzia John, Cotterell Phil

机构信息

Chair of Cancer and Palliative Nursing Care, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):210-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x
PMID:16098151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060292/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups--collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users--in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.

DESIGN

A qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures.

摘要

目的与目标

调查癌症合作团体(由英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)工作人员和服务使用者组成的协作服务改进团体)在英格兰34个癌症网络中的特点与成就,尤其探讨此类团体对当地癌症服务的影响。

设计

采用结构化电话调查、面对面访谈和文献分析的定性研究方法。

参与者与研究背景

英格兰30个有活跃合作团体的癌症网络完成了电话调查。从这30个网络中,随后选取了6个网络,从中招募参与合作团体的服务使用者、NHS专业人员以及非成员NHS专业人员参与面对面访谈。

结果与结论

大多数癌症网络都设立了合作团体。通常,这些团体处于网络层面,成立时间不到一年,每两个月开会一次,成员包括服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员。确定了五项常见活动与成就:团体自身的建立;作为咨询的“参考”团体;与其他团体建立联系并代表其发声;患者信息与沟通以及积极施加影响。随着团体的发展,活动在规模和复杂性上不断推进。团体已经掌握了变革管理的基础知识,一些团体认为对NHS变革过程有更深入的理解对团体的积极性和存续至关重要。在衡量参与策略的影响时,采用包括过程和结果指标在内的广泛成功指标似乎很重要。