• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

毒理学关注阈值概念在制药生产操作中的应用。

Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations.

作者信息

Dolan David G, Naumann Bruce D, Sargent Edward V, Maier Andrew, Dourson Michael

机构信息

Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889-0200, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Oct;43(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.06.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.06.010
PMID:16099564
Abstract

A scientific rationale is provided for estimating acceptable daily intake values (ADIs) for compounds with limited or no toxicity information to support pharmaceutical manufacturing operations. These ADIs are based on application of the "thresholds of toxicological concern" (TTC) principle, in which levels of human exposure are estimated that pose no appreciable risk to human health. The same concept has been used by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to establish "thresholds of regulation" for indirect food additives and adopted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives for flavoring substances. In practice, these values are used as a statement of safety and indicate when no actions need to be taken in a given exposure situation. Pharmaceutical manufacturing relies on ADIs for cleaning validation of process equipment and atypical extraneous matter investigations. To provide practical guidance for handling situations where relatively unstudied compounds with limited or no toxicity data are encountered, recommendations are provided on ADI values that correspond to three categories of compounds: (1) compounds that are likely to be carcinogenic, (2) compounds that are likely to be potent or highly toxic, and (3) compounds that are not likely to be potent, highly toxic or carcinogenic. Corresponding ADIs for these categories of materials are 1, 10, and 100 microg/day, respectively.

摘要

为支持制药生产操作,针对毒性信息有限或无毒性信息的化合物,提供了估算每日可接受摄入量(ADI)值的科学依据。这些ADI值基于“毒理学关注阈值”(TTC)原则应用得出,据此估算出对人体健康无明显风险的人体暴露水平。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)采用相同概念为间接食品添加剂制定“监管阈值”,食品添加剂联合专家委员会(FAO/WHO)也将其用于调味物质。实际上,这些值用作安全性声明,表明在特定暴露情况下何时无需采取行动。制药生产依靠ADI值进行工艺设备的清洁验证和非典型外来物质调查。为处理遇到毒性数据有限或无毒性数据的相对未充分研究化合物的情况提供实用指南,针对三类化合物的ADI值给出建议:(1)可能具有致癌性的化合物;(2)可能具有强效或高毒性的化合物;(3)不太可能具有强效、高毒性或致癌性的化合物。这些类别物质对应的ADI值分别为1、10和100微克/天。

相似文献

1
Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations.毒理学关注阈值概念在制药生产操作中的应用。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Oct;43(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.06.010.
2
Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing.饮食中化学物质的毒理学关注阈值:评估毒性测试需求的实用工具。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2000 Feb-Mar;38(2-3):255-312. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00120-9.
3
Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI.每日允许摄入量/暂定每日允许摄入量/每日耐受摄入量的背景知识。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;30(2 Pt 2):S109-13. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1335.
4
Toxicology databases and the concept of thresholds of toxicological concern as used by the JECFA for the safety evaluation of flavouring agents.毒理学数据库以及食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)在评估调味剂安全性时所使用的毒理学关注阈值概念。
Toxicol Lett. 2004 Apr 1;149(1-3):223-34. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.034.
5
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
6
The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food.阈值对食品中致癌物风险评估的影响。
Mutat Res. 2009 Aug;678(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 May 13.
7
Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in food safety assessment.食品安全评估中的毒理学关注阈值(TTC)
Toxicol Lett. 2002 Feb 28;127(1-3):43-6. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00481-7.
8
Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern--guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.基于结构的毒理学关注阈值——应用于饮食中低含量物质的指南。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Sep 1;207(2 Suppl):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.034.
9
Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose.评估吸入 TTC 值与 RepDose 数据库。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):259-74. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
10
The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) in risk assessment.风险评估中的毒理学关注阈值(TTC)。
Toxicol Lett. 2008 Aug 15;180(2):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Some Glutamic Acid Derivatives with Biological Potential by Computational Methods.通过计算方法鉴定具有生物潜力的一些谷氨酸衍生物。
Molecules. 2023 May 16;28(10):4123. doi: 10.3390/molecules28104123.
2
Metforminium Decavanadate (MetfDeca) Treatment Ameliorates Hippocampal Neurodegeneration and Recognition Memory in a Metabolic Syndrome Model.二甲双胍十钒酸铵(MetfDeca)治疗可改善代谢综合征模型中海马神经退行性变和识别记忆。
Neurochem Res. 2021 May;46(5):1151-1165. doi: 10.1007/s11064-021-03250-z. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for novel pharmaceutical modalities.
关于设定新型药物制剂职业接触限值的考量因素。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;118:104813. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104813. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits.大鼠和家兔产前发育毒性的毒理学关注阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:157-172. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control.基于风险的纳米材料分组用于职业接触控制的开发。
J Nanopart Res. 2012 Sep;14:1029. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1029-8. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
6
The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.职业接触限值的全球格局——实施协调原则以指导限值选择
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1060327.