Roch Antoine, Michelet Pierre, D'journo Benoit, Brousse Denis, Blayac Dorothee, Lambert Dominique, Auffray Jean-Pierre
Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpitaux Sud.
Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):927-33. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.927.
The measurement of extravascular lung water index by double indicator (EVLWIdi) or the measurement of extravascular lung water index by transpulmonary thermodilution (EVLWItt) could be useful after pneumonectomy. Since pulmonary blood flow and volume are altered after pneumonectomy, the validity of these methods is uncertain. This study has compared measurements of EVLWIdi and EVLWItt with measurement of extravascular lung water index by gravimetry (EVLWIg) in a porcine model of pulmonary edema induced after right pneumonectomy.
Randomized laboratory study.
Animal research laboratory.
Twenty-seven female pigs; mean weight, 35 +/- 5 kg (+/- SD).
The pigs were anesthetized, placed on mechanical ventilation, and allocated to a two-lung group (n = 10) or a right pneumonectomy group (n = 17). EVLWIdi and EVLWItt were measured at baseline, 60 min after pneumonectomy, and 60 min after IV injection of oleic acid (OA).
There was a good correlation between EVLWIg and EVLWIdi values (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001 in the two-lung group; and r = 0.81, p = 0.02 in the pneumonectomy group). EVLWIdi underestimated EVLWIg in the two-lung group (- 3 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 7 to + 2 mL/kg) and in the pneumonectomy group (- 0.9 mL/kg; 95% CI, - 3.3 to + 1.5 mL/kg). After pneumonectomy, EVLWItt decreased in mean by 27% and increased in mean by 70% after OA acid. There was a good correlation between EVLWIg and EVLWItt values (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001 in the two-lung group; and r = 0.90, p < 0.0001 after pneumonectomy). EVLWItt slightly overestimated gravimetric value in the two-lung group (+ 1.5 mL/kg; 95% CI, - 1.5 to + 4.2 mL/kg) and largely overestimated gravimetric value after pneumonectomy (+ 5 mL/kg; 95% CI, + 3.4 to + 6.8 mL/kg).
Double-indicator and transpulmonary thermodilution methods could be useful in monitoring extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) after pneumonectomy, but transpulmonary thermodilution largely overestimates EVLWI.
双指示剂法测量血管外肺水指数(EVLWIdi)或经肺热稀释法测量血管外肺水指数(EVLWItt)在肺切除术后可能有用。由于肺切除术后肺血流量和血容量会发生改变,这些方法的有效性尚不确定。本研究在右肺切除术后诱发肺水肿的猪模型中,比较了EVLWIdi和EVLWItt测量值与重量法测量的血管外肺水指数(EVLWIg)。
随机实验室研究。
动物研究实验室。
27只雌性猪;平均体重35±5千克(±标准差)。
猪麻醉后进行机械通气,分为双肺组(n = 10)或右肺切除组(n = 17)。在基线、肺切除术后60分钟和静脉注射油酸(OA)后60分钟测量EVLWIdi和EVLWItt。
EVLWIg与EVLWIdi值之间具有良好的相关性(双肺组r = 0.96,p < 0.0001;肺切除组r = 0.81,p = 0.02)。双肺组中EVLWIdi低估了EVLWIg(-3 mL/kg;95%置信区间[CI],-7至+2 mL/kg),肺切除组中也低估了EVLWIg(-0.9 mL/kg;95%CI,-3.3至+1.5 mL/kg)。肺切除术后,EVLWItt平均下降27%,注射油酸后平均增加70%。EVLWIg与EVLWItt值之间具有良好的相关性(双肺组r = 0.96,p < 0.0001;肺切除术后r = 0.90,p < 0.0001)。双肺组中EVLWItt略微高估了重量法测量值(+1.5 mL/kg;95%CI,-1.5至+4.2 mL/kg),肺切除术后则大幅高估了重量法测量值(+5 mL/kg;95%CI,+3.4至+6.8 mL/kg)。
双指示剂法和经肺热稀释法在监测肺切除术后血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)方面可能有用,但经肺热稀释法在很大程度上高估了EVLWI。