• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处方隐私:医生在保护患者隐私方面的不确定作用。

Prescribing privacy: the uncertain role of the physician in the protection of patient privacy.

作者信息

Gellman R M

机构信息

Subcommittee on Government Information, Justice, and Agriculture, House Committee on Government Operations, USA.

出版信息

North Carol Law Rev. 1984 Jan;62(2):255-94.

PMID:16100795
Abstract

Because medical records are now more comprehensive than ever before, they increasingly are being demanded for uses both inside and outside of the medical profession. Mr. Gellman contends that existing ethical and legal guidance is inadequate to aid physicians in dealing with the confidentiality issues raised when patient information is requested or demanded from them, and supports this contention by examining the dilemmas faced by physicians presented with such requests or demands. He concludes that ethical and judicial guidance will continue to be inadequate, and that the only practical way to develop suitable guidance is through legislation.

摘要

由于医疗记录如今比以往任何时候都更加全面,医疗行业内外对其的需求也越来越大。盖尔曼先生认为,现有的伦理和法律指导不足以帮助医生应对在被要求提供患者信息时所引发的保密问题,并通过审视医生在面对此类要求时所面临的困境来支持这一观点。他得出结论,伦理和司法指导仍将不足,而制定合适指导的唯一可行方法是通过立法。

相似文献

1
Prescribing privacy: the uncertain role of the physician in the protection of patient privacy.处方隐私:医生在保护患者隐私方面的不确定作用。
North Carol Law Rev. 1984 Jan;62(2):255-94.
2
Ethical problems for physicians raised by AIDS and HIV infection: conflicting legal obligations of confidentiality and disclosure.艾滋病和艾滋病毒感染给医生带来的伦理问题:保密与披露的法律义务冲突。
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev. 1989 Winter;22(2):557-92.
3
Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
Ohio State Law J. 1998;58(5):1809-66.
4
Privacy rights in personal information: HIPAA and the privacy gap between fundamental privacy rights and medical information.个人信息中的隐私权:《健康保险流通与责任法案》以及基本隐私权与医疗信息之间的隐私差距。
John Marshall J Comput Inf Law. 2001 Summer;19(4):535-55.
5
Health and human services' privacy proposal: a failed attempt at health information privacy protection.卫生与公众服务部的隐私提案:保护健康信息隐私的一次失败尝试。
Brandeis Law J. 2002 Summer;40(4):1065-84.
6
Hippocrates to HIPAA: a foundation for a federal physician-patient privilege.从希波克拉底到《健康保险流通与责任法案》:联邦医患保密特权的基础
Temple Law Rev. 2004 Fall;77(3):505-75.
7
The impact of privacy regulations on clinical research.隐私法规对临床研究的影响。
J Biolaw Bus. 2002;5(3):50-3.
8
The need to know versus the right to know: privacy of patient medical data in an information-based society.知情权与知晓权:信息社会中患者医疗数据的隐私问题
Suffolk Univ Law Rev. 1997 Winter;30(4):1183-218.
9
The protection of patient privacy in a high-tech era.高科技时代的患者隐私保护。
J Nurs Law. 2001 Jun;8(1):17-26.
10
Grave secrets: legal and ethical analysis of postmortem confidentiality.
Conn Law Rev. 2001 Fall;34(1):81-122.

引用本文的文献

1
The Hippocratic bargain and health information technology.希波克拉底协定与健康信息技术
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Spring;38(1):7-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00460.x.
2
Public goods, private data: HIV and the history, ethics, and uses of identifiable public health information.公共物品,私人数据:艾滋病病毒与可识别公共卫生信息的历史、伦理及用途
Public Health Rep. 2007;122 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/00333549071220S103.