• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部轮廓吸引力的专业评估。

Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.

作者信息

Soh Jen, Chew Ming Tak, Wong Hwee Bee

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, National University Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.041.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.041
PMID:16102405
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the assessments of Chinese facial profile attractiveness by orthodontists and oral surgeons.

METHODS

The sample comprised 31 dental professionals (20 orthodontists, 11 oral surgeons) in an Asian community. Facial profile photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 2 Chinese adults (1 man, 1 woman) with normal profiles, Class I incisor relationships, and Class I skeletal patterns were digitized. The digital images were modified by altering cephalometric skeletal and dental hard tissue Chinese normative values in increments of 2 standard deviations in the anteroposterior plane to obtain 7 facial profiles for each sex. The images were bimaxillary protrusion, protrusive mandible, retrusive mandible, normal profile (Class I incisor with Class I skeletal pattern), retrusive maxilla, protrusive maxilla, and bimaxillary retrusion. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine professional differences in assessment. Multiple regression analysis was performed with age, professional status, sex, and number of years in practice as independent variables.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A strong correlation was found in the profile assessment between orthodontists and oral surgeons. Normal and bimaxillary retrusive Chinese male and female profiles were judged to be highly attractive by orthodontists and oral surgeons. Chinese male and female profiles with protrusive mandibles were judged the least attractive. There was a difference in professional opinion about the most attractive male profile (P < .05), with orthodontists preferring a flatter profile and oral surgeons preferring a fuller normal Chinese profile. Sex of dental professionals and number of years in clinical practice were found to affect profile rankings.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较正畸医生和口腔外科医生对中国人面部侧貌吸引力的评估。

方法

样本包括亚洲社区的31名牙科专业人员(20名正畸医生,11名口腔外科医生)。选取2名具有正常侧貌、I类切牙关系和I类骨骼型的中国成年人(1名男性,1名女性)的面部侧貌照片和头颅侧位X线片进行数字化处理。通过在前后平面上以2个标准差的增量改变头颅测量骨骼和牙齿硬组织的中国正常值来修改数字图像,从而为每种性别获得7种面部侧貌。这些图像分别为双颌前突、下颌前突、下颌后缩、正常侧貌(I类切牙伴I类骨骼型)、上颌后缩、上颌前突和双颌后缩。采用曼-惠特尼U检验来确定评估中的专业差异。以年龄、专业地位、性别和从业年限作为自变量进行多元回归分析。

结果与结论

正畸医生和口腔外科医生在侧貌评估方面存在很强的相关性。正畸医生和口腔外科医生都认为正常和双颌后缩的中国男性和女性侧貌极具吸引力。下颌前突的中国男性和女性侧貌被认为最缺乏吸引力。在对最具吸引力的男性侧貌的专业意见上存在差异(P < .05),正畸医生更喜欢较扁平的侧貌,而口腔外科医生更喜欢更丰满的正常中国侧貌。发现牙科专业人员的性别和临床从业年限会影响侧貌排名。

相似文献

1
Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.面部轮廓吸引力的专业评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.041.
2
A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.对中国人面部轮廓美学认知的比较评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.018.
3
An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.一个亚洲社区对面部轮廓吸引力的看法。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00304.x.
4
Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.从白人视角对亚裔华裔面部轮廓的美学评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):532-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.038.
5
Ranking of facial profiles among Asians.亚洲人面部轮廓的排名。
J Esthet Dent. 1992 Jul-Aug;4(4):128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00679.x.
6
Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗后中美患者面部美观度的头影测量与照片测量之间的相关性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.020.
7
Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.采用三维照片进行面部轮廓研究,以评估香港中国正颌患者和非专业人士的审美偏好。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Feb;161(2):e105-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
8
Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.双颌前突患者正畸治疗后侧面轮廓客观与主观评价的相关性
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):690-8. doi: 10.2319/070714-476.1. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults.下颌前后位置对日本成年人面部吸引力的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.021.
10
Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.接受下颌前徙手术治疗的正畸患者的面部轮廓变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.033.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Quadratic-Linear Correlations Between Cephalometric Measurements and Profile Esthetics in Adult Orthodontic Patients.成人正畸患者头影测量与侧貌美学二次线性相关性的回顾性横断面研究
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):1472-1481. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.015. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
2
Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Profile Esthetics.非专业人士和牙科专业人员对面部美学中异常感知的阈值:轮廓美学
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 8;2020:2068961. doi: 10.1155/2020/2068961. eCollection 2020.
3
Effects of different nose types on class II treatments for female patients.
不同鼻型对女性患者 II 类治疗的影响。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Dec 2;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0296-7.
4
Glabellar vertical line as a reference goal for anteroposterior maxillary position.眉间垂线作为上颌前后位置的参考目标。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Aug 1;24(3):45.e1-45.e5. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.45.e1-5.onl.
5
The Esthetic Difference of Chinese Beauty Evaluated by Two Different Human Races Based on Three-Dimensional Average Face Analysis.基于三维平均脸分析的两个不同人种对中国美人审美差异的评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jul;30(5):1435-1440. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005316.
6
The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.下颌骨矢状位在面部吸引力和社会认知中的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-86. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.077-086.oar.
7
Extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic in the 21st century: Demographic and diagnostic factors affecting the likelihood of extraction.21世纪一所大学正畸诊所的拔牙频率:影响拔牙可能性的人口统计学和诊断因素
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Mar;151(3):456-462. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.021.
8
Multiracial Facial Golden Ratio and Evaluation of Facial Appearance.多种族面部黄金比例与面部外观评估
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 12;10(11):e0142914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142914. eCollection 2015.
9
Perception of Aesthetics by Different Professionals of Different Communities.不同群体的不同专业人士对美学的认知。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC18-22. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14045.6584. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
A study to evaluate cephalometric hard tissue profile of Tamil population for orthognathic surgery.一项评估泰米尔人群用于正颌外科手术的头影测量硬组织侧貌的研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S680-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163600.