Suppr超能文献

非专业人士和牙科专业人员对面部美学中异常感知的阈值:轮廓美学

Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Profile Esthetics.

作者信息

Alrbata Raed H, Alfaqih Ayham Kh, Almhaidat Mohammad R, Al-Tarawneh Ahmad M

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 8;2020:2068961. doi: 10.1155/2020/2068961. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

AIM

To find thresholds at which laypersons and dental professionals from Jordanian population perceive abnormalities in sagittal positioning of upper and lower jaws as a major determinant to facial profile esthetics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using photo editing software, a baseline profile image of a young male was manipulated on a 2 mm incremental basis to move each of the upper and lower jaws backward and forward relative to true vertical line (TVL) at which four variables of maxillary and mandibular retrusion and protrusion were researched. A total of 120 participants divided equally into four groups of laypersons, general dental practitioners (GDPs), orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs) rated the images using an analog scale of 100 mm long. The image that showed the first statistical difference compared to the baseline was considered as a threshold of abnormality.

RESULTS

Laypersons, GDPs, and OMFSs perceived the abnormality in the maxillary retrusion at -5 mm to TVL, while orthodontists defined that at -3 mm. All dental professionals perceived the abnormality in the maxillary protrusion at +1 mm to TVL while the layperson group at +3 mm. A threshold of -7 mm mandibular retrusion to TVL was abnormally perceived by all groups. All dental professionals realized the abnormality in the mandibular protrusion at 0 mm to TVL while the laypersons at +2 mm.

CONCLUSION

These thresholds regarding profile esthetics may contribute to the process of establishing proper orthodontic treatment planning that suits the highest facial esthetic standards.

摘要

目的

找出约旦人群中的非专业人士和牙科专业人员将上下颌矢状位异常视为面部轮廓美学主要决定因素的阈值。

材料与方法

使用照片编辑软件,以2毫米的增量对一名年轻男性的基线侧面图像进行处理,使上下颌分别相对于真垂线(TVL)前后移动,研究上颌和下颌后缩及前突的四个变量。总共120名参与者平均分为四组,即非专业人士、普通牙科医生(GDPs)、正畸医生和口腔颌面外科医生(OMFSs),使用100毫米长的模拟量表对图像进行评分。与基线相比显示出第一个统计学差异的图像被视为异常阈值。

结果

非专业人士、GDPs和OMFSs将上颌后缩至TVL -5毫米处视为异常,而正畸医生将其定义为-3毫米。所有牙科专业人员将上颌前突至TVL +1毫米处视为异常,而非专业人士组为+3毫米。所有组均将下颌后缩至TVL -7毫米处视为异常。所有牙科专业人员将下颌前突至TVL 0毫米处视为异常,而非专业人士为+2毫米。

结论

这些关于轮廓美学的阈值可能有助于制定符合最高面部美学标准的适当正畸治疗计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e0a/7568134/eae7d832b781/IJD2020-2068961.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Profile Esthetics.
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 8;2020:2068961. doi: 10.1155/2020/2068961. eCollection 2020.
2
Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Frontal Esthetics.
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 17;2020:8946063. doi: 10.1155/2020/8946063. eCollection 2020.
3
A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.018.
6
Perception of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists and laypersons in relation to the harmony of the smile.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1664-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Feb;161(2):e105-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Sep;154(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.040.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
True vertical validation in facial orthognathic surgery planning.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Dec 1;5(5):e231-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.51188.
3
Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):103-11. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq028. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
4
An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00304.x.
5
Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.041.
6
Ranking facial attractiveness.
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):340-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji042.
7
Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population.
Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):640-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0640:FPPAVL>2.0.CO;2.
8
Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Sep;126(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.006.
9
Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003 Feb;6(1):63-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2003.2c097.x.
10
Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):464-71. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113656.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验