Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Center of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
Discipline of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Feb;161(2):e105-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
This study was conducted to investigate and compare esthetic perceptions of different facial profiles among Hong Kong Chinese laypersons and patients scheduled for orthognathic treatment.
Two sets of 3-dimensional facial photographs (1 male and 1 female) each comprised 7 images that showed different dentoskeletal relations (ie, Class I, bimaxillary protrusion, bimaxillary retrusion, maxillary protrusion, maxillary retrusion, mandibular protrusion, and mandibular retrusion). The sets of photographs were shown to 101 laypersons (age, 28.87 ± 6.22 years) and 60 patients seeking orthognathic treatment (age, 27.12 ± 6.07 years). They rated their esthetic perceptions of the photographs on the basis of a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (very unattractive) to 100 (very attractive).
The dentoskeletal Class I facial profile was ranked as the most attractive profile. Female orthognathic judges selected the retrusive maxilla while male orthognathic judges and male and female laypersons ranked the mandibular protrusion profile as the least attractive profile for both females and males. A bimaxillary protrusive female profile was viewed as more attractive by the orthognathic male (P = 0.006) and female (P = 0.006) judges, compared with female layperson judges. After adjustment for age, no statistically significant interaction between sex and judges (P >0.10) for all VAS scores were detected. For the female bimaxillary protrusive profile, orthognathic patient judges assigned a mean VAS score of 9.174 points higher than layperson judges (95% confidence interval, 3.11-15.24; P = 0.003).
Dentoskeletal Class I facial profile was generally considered the most attractive profile in both sexes; male and female orthognathic patients preferred a bimaxillary protrusive female profile. A concave facial profile was perceived as least attractive in both sexes.
本研究旨在调查和比较香港中文背景的非专业人士和接受正颌治疗的患者对面部不同侧貌的审美感知。
两组 3 维面部照片(1 男 1 女)各包含 7 张不同牙颌面关系的图片(即 I 类、双颌前突、双颌后缩、上颌前突、上颌后缩、下颌前突和下颌后缩)。将这两组照片展示给 101 名非专业人士(年龄 28.87±6.22 岁)和 60 名接受正颌治疗的患者(年龄 27.12±6.07 岁)。他们使用 100mm 视觉模拟评分(VAS)从 0(非常不吸引人)到 100(非常吸引人)对照片的审美感知进行评分。
牙颌面 I 类的侧貌被评为最吸引人的侧貌。女性正颌医生选择上颌后缩,而男性正颌医生和男性及女性非专业人士则将下颌前突的侧貌评为男女最不吸引人的侧貌。与女性非专业人士相比,男性(P=0.006)和女性(P=0.006)正颌医生认为双颌前突的女性侧貌更有吸引力。在调整年龄后,所有 VAS 评分在性别和法官之间没有统计学意义的相互作用(P>0.10)。对于女性双颌前突的侧貌,正颌患者法官的平均 VAS 评分比非专业人士高 9.174 分(95%置信区间,3.11-15.24;P=0.003)。
在两性中,牙颌面 I 类侧貌通常被认为是最有吸引力的;男性和女性正颌患者更喜欢双颌前突的女性侧貌。凹面型在两性中被认为是最不吸引人的。