Still D L, Temme L A
Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Naval Air Station, Pensacola, FL 32508-5700.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1992 Apr;63(4):273-5.
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the night carrier landing performance of pilots who do not need prescriptive eyeglasses to fly is better than the performance of pilots who do. Night carrier landing scores (NCLS), age, career jet flight hours, and total career flight hours were obtained for 122 U.S. Navy fighter pilots participating in air combat maneuver training at NAS, Oceana, VA. of the pilots with NCLS, 16 used a prescribed spectacle correction while flying, 106 did not. This study compared the NCLS of the two groups of pilots, those with glasses and those without. We found no significant difference in NCLS between the two groups of pilots--even when the pilots were matched on the basis of age and flight experience. We conclude that pilots who have a refractive error and are required to wear an eyeglass correction while flying perform night carrier landings as well as the pilots who have no refractive error and are permitted to fly with no eye glass correction.
无需佩戴处方眼镜飞行的飞行员的夜间航母着陆性能优于需要佩戴处方眼镜飞行的飞行员。我们获取了122名在弗吉尼亚州奥西阿纳海军航空站参加空战机动训练的美国海军战斗机飞行员的夜间航母着陆分数(NCLS)、年龄、喷气式飞机飞行小时数和总飞行小时数。在有NCLS的飞行员中,16人在飞行时使用处方眼镜矫正,106人不使用。本研究比较了两组飞行员(戴眼镜的和不戴眼镜的)的NCLS。我们发现两组飞行员的NCLS没有显著差异——即使在根据年龄和飞行经验进行匹配的情况下也是如此。我们得出结论,有屈光不正且飞行时需要佩戴眼镜矫正的飞行员进行夜间航母着陆的表现与没有屈光不正且无需佩戴眼镜矫正即可飞行的飞行员一样好。