Magid David J, Wang Yongfei, Herrin Jeph, McNamara Robert L, Bradley Elizabeth H, Curtis Jeptha P, Pollack Charles V, French William J, Blaney Martha E, Krumholz Harlan M
Clinical Research Unit, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, USA.
JAMA. 2005 Aug 17;294(7):803-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.7.803.
Understanding how door-to-drug and door-to-balloon times vary by time of day and day of week can inform the design of interventions to improve the timeliness of reperfusion therapy.
To determine the pattern of door-to-drug and door-to-balloon times by time of day and day of week and whether this pattern may affect mortality.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study of 68,439 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy and 33,647 treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 1999 through 2002. We classified patient hospital arrival period into regular hours (weekdays, 7 am-5 pm) and off-hours (weekdays 5 pm-7 am and weekends).
Geometric mean door-to-drug time for fibrinolytic therapy and door-to-balloon time for PCI and all-cause in-hospital mortality. All outcomes were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.
Most fibrinolytic therapy (67.9%) and PCI patients (54.2%) were treated during off-hours. Door-to-drug times were slightly longer during off-hours (34.3 minutes) than regular hours (33.2 minutes; difference, 1.0 minute; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-1.4; P<.001). In contrast, door-to-balloon times were substantially longer during off-hours (116.1 minutes) than regular hours (94.8 minutes; difference, 21.3 minutes; 95% CI, 20.5-22.2; P<.001). A lower percentage of patients met guideline recommended times for door-to-balloon during off-hours (25.7%) than regular hours (47%; P<.001). Door-to-balloon times exceeding 120 minutes occurred much more commonly during off-hours (41.5%) than regular hours (27.7%; P<.001). Longer off-hours door-to-balloon times were primarily due to a longer interval between obtaining the electrocardiogram and patient arrival at the catheterization laboratory (off-hours, 69.8 minutes vs regular hours, 49.1 minutes; P<.001). This pattern was consistent across all hospital subgroups examined. Furthermore, patients presenting during off-hours had significantly higher adjusted in-hospital mortality than patients presenting during regular hours (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; P = .02).
Presentation during off-hours was common and was associated with substantially longer times to treatment for PCI but not for fibrinolytic therapy. To achieve the best outcomes, hospitals providing PCI during off-hours should commit to doing so in a timely manner.
了解从入院到用药时间以及从入院到球囊扩张时间如何随一天中的时间和一周中的日期变化,可为改善再灌注治疗及时性的干预措施设计提供参考。
确定从入院到用药时间以及从入院到球囊扩张时间随一天中的时间和一周中的日期的变化模式,以及这种模式是否可能影响死亡率。
设计、地点和参与者:对1999年至2002年期间接受纤维蛋白溶解疗法治疗的68439例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者和接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的33647例患者进行队列研究。我们将患者到达医院的时间段分为正常时间(工作日,上午7点至下午5点)和非工作时间(工作日下午5点至上午7点以及周末)。
纤维蛋白溶解疗法的从入院到用药时间的几何平均数、PCI的从入院到球囊扩张时间以及全因院内死亡率。所有结果均针对患者和医院特征进行了调整。
大多数接受纤维蛋白溶解疗法的患者(67.9%)和接受PCI的患者(54.2%)在非工作时间接受治疗。非工作时间的从入院到用药时间(34.3分钟)略长于正常时间(33.2分钟;差异为1.0分钟;95%置信区间[CI],0.7 - 1.4;P <.001)。相比之下,非工作时间的从入院到球囊扩张时间(116.1分钟)比正常时间(94.8分钟)长得多(差异为21.3分钟;95% CI,20.5 - 22.2;P <.001)。与正常时间(47%)相比,非工作时间达到指南推荐的从入院到球囊扩张时间的患者比例更低(25.7%;P <.001)。超过120分钟的从入院到球囊扩张时间在非工作时间(41.5%)比正常时间(27.7%)更常见(P <.001)。非工作时间较长的从入院到球囊扩张时间主要是由于从获取心电图到患者到达导管实验室的间隔时间较长(非工作时间为69.8分钟,正常时间为49.1分钟;P <.001)。在所有检查的医院亚组中,这种模式都是一致的。此外,在非工作时间就诊的患者经调整后的院内死亡率显著高于在正常时间就诊的患者(优势比,1.07;95% CI,1.01 - 1.14;P = 0.02)。
在非工作时间就诊很常见,且与PCI的治疗时间显著延长相关,但与纤维蛋白溶解疗法无关。为了获得最佳结果,在非工作时间提供PCI的医院应致力于及时进行治疗。