Department of Ageing and Therapeutics, and Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick Hospitals Group, Limerick, Ireland.
School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0304536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304536. eCollection 2024.
There is conflicting evidence regarding the outcomes of acute stroke patients who present to hospital within normal working hours ('in-hours') compared with the 'out-of-hours' period. This study aimed to assess the effect of time of stroke presentation on outcomes within the Irish context, to inform national stroke service delivery.
A secondary analysis of data from the Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS) from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 was carried out. Patient and process outcomes were assessed for patients presenting 'in-hours' (8:00-17:00 Monday-Friday) compared with 'out-of-hours' (all other times).
Data on arrival time were available for 13,996 patients (male 56.2%; mean age 72.5 years), of which 55.7% presented 'out-of-hours'. In hospital mortality was significantly lower among those admitted 'in-hours' (11.3%, n = 534) compared with 'out-of-hours' (12.8%, n = 749); (adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) 0.82; 95% Confidence Interval CI [95% CI] 0.72-0.89). Poor functional outcome at discharge (Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3) was also significantly lower in those presenting 'in-hours' (adjusted OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.91). In patients receiving thrombolysis, mean door to needle time was shorter for 'in-hours' presentation at 55.8 mins (n = 562; SD 35.43 mins), compared with 'out-of-hours' presentation at 80.5 mins (n = 736; SD 38.55 mins, p < .001).
More than half of stroke patients in Ireland present 'out-of-hours' and these presentations are associated with a higher mortality and a lower odds of functional independence at discharge. It is imperative that stroke pathways consider the 24 hour period to ensure the delivery of effective stroke care, and modification of 'out-of-hours' stroke care is required to improve overall outcomes.
关于在正常工作时间(“上班时间”)内到医院就诊的急性中风患者与“非工作时间”内就诊的患者的结局,目前存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在评估爱尔兰中风患者发病时间对患者结局的影响,为国家中风服务提供信息。
对 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间爱尔兰国家中风审计(INAS)的数据进行了二次分析。与“非工作时间”(所有其他时间)相比,评估了在“上班时间”(周一至周五 8:00-17:00)就诊的患者的患者和治疗结局。
共有 13996 名患者(男性 56.2%;平均年龄 72.5 岁)的到达时间数据可用,其中 55.7%在“非工作时间”就诊。与“非工作时间”就诊的患者(12.8%,n=749)相比,在“上班时间”就诊的患者的住院死亡率明显较低(11.3%,n=534);(调整后的优势比(OR)0.82;95%置信区间(95%CI)为 0.72-0.89)。出院时功能结局较差(改良 Rankin 量表≥3)的患者在“上班时间”就诊的比例也明显较低(调整后的 OR 0.79;95%CI 0.68-0.91)。在接受溶栓治疗的患者中,“上班时间”就诊的平均门到针时间为 55.8 分钟(n=562;SD 35.43 分钟),而“非工作时间”就诊的平均门到针时间为 80.5 分钟(n=736;SD 38.55 分钟,p<.001)。
爱尔兰超过一半的中风患者在“非工作时间”就诊,这些就诊与更高的死亡率和出院时功能独立性的可能性降低有关。中风治疗途径必须考虑 24 小时时间,以确保有效提供中风治疗,并且需要修改“非工作时间”的中风治疗,以改善整体结局。