Lin Peter H, Bush Ruth L, Peden Eric, Zhou Wei, Kougias Panagiotis, Henao Esteban, Mohiuddin Imran, Lumsden Alan B
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):113-23. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700211.
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as an acceptable treatment alternative in high-risk patients with carotid stenosis. This study assessed the effect of the learning curve on treatment complications and clinical outcome of CAS. Clinical variables and treatment outcomes of 200 consecutive CAS procedures in 182 patients (mean age, 72 years) with carotid stenosis of 70% or greater during a 40-month period were analyzed. Technical success, periprocedural complications, and treatment outcomes were compared in four sequential groups (group I, II, III, and IV) of 50 consecutive interventions. Treatment indications and relevant risk factors were similar among the four groups. The overall technical success was 98%, and the combined 30-day stroke and death rates was 2.5%. An increase in the technical success rate was noted in the latter three groups compared with group I (P < .05). Total procedural time and contrast volume were significantly higher in group I compared with the latter three groups (P < .05). The intraoperative anticoagulation regimen was changed from an intravenous heparin combination to bivalirudin after the first 54 cases, resulting in reduced bleeding complications in groups III and IV (P = .03) compared with group I. The 30-day stroke and death rate in groups I and II was 8% and 2%, which was reduced significantly to 0% in groups III and IV (P < .05). A Cox regression model identified procedural volume (P = .03) as a predictor of a reduced complication rate. Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection can provide excellent treatment outcome. Our experience demonstrates a procedural-associated learning curve, as evidenced by the reduced procedural-related complications, fluoroscopic time, and contrast volume that occurred with an increase in physician experience. The procedural success is also enhanced partly by endovascular device refinement and improved anticoagulation regimen. Successful outcome of CAS can be achieved once physicians overcome the initial procedural-related learning curve.
颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)已成为高危颈动脉狭窄患者可接受的治疗选择。本研究评估了学习曲线对CAS治疗并发症和临床结局的影响。分析了182例(平均年龄72岁)颈动脉狭窄70%及以上患者在40个月期间连续进行的200例CAS手术的临床变量和治疗结局。在连续50例干预的四个连续组(I组、II组、III组和IV组)中比较了技术成功率、围手术期并发症和治疗结局。四组之间的治疗指征和相关危险因素相似。总体技术成功率为98%,30天卒中与死亡率合并为2.5%。与I组相比,后三组的技术成功率有所提高(P <.05)。I组的总手术时间和造影剂用量明显高于后三组(P <.05)。在前54例病例后,术中抗凝方案从静脉肝素联合改为比伐卢定,与I组相比,III组和IV组的出血并发症减少(P =.03)。I组和II组的30天卒中和死亡率分别为8%和2%,III组和IV组显著降至0%(P <.05)。Cox回归模型确定手术量(P =.03)是并发症发生率降低的预测因素。带神经保护的颈动脉支架置入术可提供出色的治疗效果。我们的经验表明存在与手术相关的学习曲线,医生经验增加导致与手术相关的并发症、透视时间和造影剂用量减少证明了这一点。血管内装置的改进和抗凝方案的改善也部分提高了手术成功率。一旦医生克服了最初与手术相关的学习曲线,就可以实现CAS的成功结局。