Lin Peter H, Bush Ruth L, Peden Eric K, Zhou Wei, Guerrero Marlon, Henao Esteban A, Kougias Panagiotis, Mohiuddin Imran, Lumsden Alan B
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Veterans Administration Medical Center (112), 2002 Holcomb Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):850-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.008.
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as an acceptable treatment alternative in high-risk patients with carotid stenosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the learning curve on treatment complications and the clinical outcomes of CAS.
Clinical variables and treatment outcomes of 200 consecutive CAS procedures in 182 patients (mean age 72 years) with carotid stenosis > or = 70% during a 40-month period were analyzed. Four sequential groups (groups I, II, III, and IV) of 50 consecutive interventions were compared with regard to technical success, periprocedural complications, and treatment outcomes.
Treatment indications and relevant risk factors were similar among the 4 groups. The overall technical success and combined 30-day stroke and death rates were 98% and 2.5%, respectively. An increase in the technical success rate was noted in the latter 3 groups compared with group I (P < .05). Total procedural time and contrast volume were significantly higher in group I compared with the latter 3 groups (P < .05). The intraoperative anticoagulation regimen was changed from intravenous heparin combination to bivalirudin after the first 54 patients, which resulted in decreased bleeding complications in groups III and IV (P = 0.03) compared with the first group. The 30-day stroke and death rate in groups I and II were 8% and 2%, respectively, and was decreased significantly in groups III and IV (0% and 0%, respectively, P < .05). A Cox regression model identified procedural volume (P = .03) as a predictor of decreased complication rate.
CAS with neuroprotection can provide excellent treatment outcomes. Our experience demonstrates a procedure-associated learning curve as evidenced by decreased procedure-related complications, fluoroscopic time, and contrast volume occurring with increased physician experience. Procedural success was also enhanced partly by endovascular device refinement and an improved anticoagulation regimen. Successful CAS outcomes can be achieved once physicians overcome the initial procedure-related learning curve.
对于颈动脉狭窄的高危患者,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)已成为一种可接受的治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估学习曲线对CAS治疗并发症及临床结局的影响。
分析了182例(平均年龄72岁)颈动脉狭窄≥70%的患者在40个月期间连续进行的200例CAS手术的临床变量和治疗结局。将连续50例干预的四个连续组(I组、II组、III组和IV组)在技术成功率、围手术期并发症和治疗结局方面进行比较。
四组之间的治疗指征和相关危险因素相似。总体技术成功率以及30天内卒中与死亡率分别为98%和2.5%。与I组相比,后三组的技术成功率有所提高(P <.05)。I组的总手术时间和造影剂用量显著高于后三组(P <.05)。在前54例患者之后,术中抗凝方案从静脉肝素联合改为比伐卢定,这使得III组和IV组的出血并发症较第一组有所减少(P = 0.03)。I组和II组的30天卒中与死亡率分别为8%和2%,而III组和IV组显著降低(分别为0%和0%,P <.05)。Cox回归模型确定手术例数(P =.03)是并发症发生率降低的预测因素。
具有神经保护作用的CAS可提供出色的治疗结局。我们的经验表明存在与手术相关的学习曲线,表现为随着医生经验的增加,与手术相关的并发症、透视时间和造影剂用量减少。血管内装置的改进和抗凝方案的优化也部分提高了手术成功率。一旦医生克服了最初与手术相关的学习曲线,就能实现成功的CAS结局。