Pereira Sergio L, Baker Allan J
Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 2C6.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Feb;38(2):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.007. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
A recent molecular timescale for major lineages of the Galliformes indicated that Megapodiidae and possibly Cracidae, originated in the Cretaceous, while the remaining families originated in the Tertiary. This timescale was based on clock-like evolution in genetic and taxonomic partitions of mitochondrial ND2 and cyt b DNA sequences, and assumed that ordinal diversification of Galloanserae around 90 million years ago and imposed, whenever appropriate, minimum age constraints based on the fossil record. This approach is not ideal, as it did not account for uncertainty in estimating branch lengths and time, including the calibration time, and heterogeneity in the rate of DNA substitution among sites and in different lineages. Furthermore all the information available in the DNA sequences was not included, and may have been affected by stochastic error in individual gene partitions. Here, we present a follow-up analysis by estimating divergence times using a Bayesian framework that accounts for these possible sources of uncertainty. Our results based on combined and separate analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences comprised of 1756 sites of 12S rDNA, ND2 and cyt b indicated that (1) Megapodiidae and Cracidae, and likely Odontophoridae, originated in the Cretaceous; (2) estimates based on concatenated genes are less affected by stochastic error among sites and less influenced by the phylogenetic signals of individual gene partitions, which are unequally distributed along the phylogenetic tree; and (3) the use of only an external molecular calibration results in lower estimation of most ingroup node ages. We also point out that galliform fossils may not be as useful for point calibrations as was previously suggested, but instead may be better employed as priors for the estimation of node ages under a Bayesian approach.
近期关于鸡形目主要谱系的分子时间尺度表明,冢雉科以及可能的凤冠雉科起源于白垩纪,而其余科则起源于第三纪。这个时间尺度基于线粒体ND2和细胞色素b DNA序列在遗传和分类分区中的钟形进化,并假设鸡雁小纲在约9000万年前的目级分化,并在适当的时候根据化石记录施加最小年龄限制。这种方法并不理想,因为它没有考虑到估计分支长度和时间(包括校准时间)的不确定性,以及位点间和不同谱系中DNA替代率的异质性。此外,DNA序列中可用的所有信息并未全部纳入,并且可能受到单个基因分区中随机误差的影响。在这里,我们通过使用贝叶斯框架估计分歧时间进行了后续分析,该框架考虑了这些可能的不确定性来源。我们基于对由12S rDNA、ND2和细胞色素b的1756个位点组成的线粒体DNA序列进行联合和单独分析的结果表明:(1)冢雉科、凤冠雉科以及可能的齿鹑科起源于白垩纪;(2)基于串联基因的估计受位点间随机误差的影响较小,并且受沿系统发育树分布不均的单个基因分区的系统发育信号影响较小;(3)仅使用外部分子校准会导致大多数类群内节点年龄的估计值较低。我们还指出,鸡形目化石可能不像之前认为的那样对点位校准有用,而是在贝叶斯方法下作为估计节点年龄的先验信息可能会更好。