Price Martin R, Baillie Gemma L, Thomas Adèle, Stevenson Lesley A, Easson Morag, Goodwin Richard, McLean Adèle, McIntosh Lorraine, Goodwin Gillian, Walker Glenn, Westwood Paul, Marrs Julia, Thomson Fiona, Cowley Phillip, Christopoulos Arthur, Pertwee Roger G, Ross Ruth A
School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland.
Mol Pharmacol. 2005 Nov;68(5):1484-95. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.016162. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
We investigated the pharmacology of three novel compounds, Org 27569 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-(4-piperidin-1-yl-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide), Org 27759 (3-ethyl-5-fluoro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-94-dimethylamino-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide), and Org 29647 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid (1-benzyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-amide, 2-enedioic acid salt), at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. In equilibrium binding assays, the Org compounds significantly increased the binding of the CB1 receptor agonist [3H]CP 55,940 [(1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol], indicative of a positively cooperative allosteric effect. The same compounds caused a significant, but incomplete, decrease in the specific binding of the CB1 receptor inverse agonist [3H]SR 141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride], indicative of a limited negative binding cooperativity. Analysis of the data according to an allosteric ternary complex model revealed that the estimated affinity of each Org compound was not significantly different when the radioligand was [3H]CP 55,940 or [3H]SR 141716A. However, the estimated cooperatively factor for the interaction between modulator and radioligand was greater than 1 when determined against [3H]CP 55,940 and less than 1 when determined against [3H]SR 141716A. [3H]CP 55,940 dissociation kinetic studies also validated the allosteric nature of the Org compounds, because they all significantly decreased radioligand dissociation. These data suggest that the Org compounds bind allosterically to the CB1 receptor and elicit a conformational change that increases agonist affinity for the orthosteric binding site. In contrast to the binding assays, however, the Org compounds behaved as insurmountable antagonists of receptor function; in the reporter gene assay, the guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding assay and the mouse vas deferens assay they elicited a significant reduction in the Emax value for CB1 receptor agonists. The data presented clearly demonstrate, for the first time, that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor contains an allosteric binding site that can be recognized by synthetic small molecule ligands.
我们研究了三种新型化合物Org 27569(5-氯-3-乙基-1H-吲哚-2-羧酸[2-(4-哌啶-1-基-苯基)-乙基]-酰胺)、Org 27759(3-乙基-5-氟-1H-吲哚-2-羧酸[2-(4-二甲基氨基-苯基)-乙基]-酰胺)和Org 29647(5-氯-3-乙基-1H-吲哚-2-羧酸(1-苄基-吡咯烷-3-基)-酰胺,2-烯二酸盐)对大麻素CB1受体的药理学作用。在平衡结合试验中,这些Org化合物显著增加了CB1受体激动剂[3H]CP 55,940[(1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-羟基-4-(1,1-二甲基庚基)苯基]-4-(3-羟丙基)环己醇]的结合,表明存在正协同变构效应。相同的化合物使CB1受体反向激动剂[3H]SR 141716A[N-(哌啶-1-基)-5-(4-氯苯基)-1-(2,4-二氯苯基)-4-甲基-1H-吡唑-3-甲酰胺盐酸盐]的特异性结合显著但不完全降低,表明存在有限的负结合协同性。根据变构三元复合物模型对数据进行分析表明,当放射性配体为[3H]CP 55,940或[3H]SR 141716A时,每种Org化合物的估计亲和力无显著差异。然而,针对[3H]CP 55,940测定时,调节剂与放射性配体相互作用的估计协同因子大于1,而针对[3H]SR 141716A测定时则小于1。[3H]CP 55,940解离动力学研究也证实了Org化合物的变构性质,因为它们均显著降低了放射性配体的解离。这些数据表明,Org化合物与CB1受体变构结合并引发构象变化,从而增加激动剂对正位结合位点的亲和力。然而,与结合试验不同的是,Org化合物在受体功能方面表现为不可逾越的拮抗剂;在报告基因试验、鸟苷5'-O-(3-[35S]硫代)三磷酸结合试验和小鼠输精管试验中,它们使CB1受体激动剂的Emax值显著降低。所呈现的数据首次清楚地证明,大麻素CB1受体含有一个可被合成小分子配体识别的变构结合位点。