Suppr超能文献

典型的胃食管反流病症状和食管pH监测不足以诊断咽反流。

Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux.

作者信息

Oelschlager Brant K, Chang Lily, Pope Charles E, Pellegrini Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6410, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2005 Sep;128(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.02.021. Epub 2005 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abnormal pharyngeal reflux of acid (PR) (as measured by pH monitoring) is associated with microaspiration, and is a good predictor of airway symptom response to medical and surgical anti-reflux therapy. However, in clinical practice the link between airway disease and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still based on the presence of typical symptoms (e.g., heartburn) and/or standard esophageal function testing (manometry and 24-pH monitoring). PR is rarely measured directly. We undertook this study to determine if typical symptoms and standard testing could reliably predict the presence of PR.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 518 patients with suspected reflux induced airway disease evaluated from December 1998 through January 2002. Each patient completed a standardized symptom questionnaire, underwent esophageal manometry, and 24-h esophageal and pharyngeal pH monitoring. Patients were classified having abnormal pharyngeal reflux (PR+) if they had >1 episode of PR detected during pH monitoring.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-one patients were PR+ and 337 were PR-. The most common symptoms, namely cough (PR +73%, PR- 68%), hoarseness (PR +64%, PR- 66%), and dyspnea (PR +59%, PR- 59%) were present with similar incidence in PR+ and PR- patients. The incidence of heartburn was 54% in the PR+ and 52% in the PR- patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed that abnormal esophageal acid exposure was a predictor of PR+ (P < 0.001). Neither the presence of heartburn or specific respiratory symptoms, the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or upper esophageal sphincter (UES), or amplitude of esophageal contractions predicted PR+. There was substantial variability in esophageal length (UES to LES), thus the placement of the distal pH probe from the LES varied considerably (median = 13 cm, 2-20 cm). Using established normal values of acid exposure at multiple levels of the esophagus, 24% of PR+ patients had normal amounts of esophageal acid exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Typical GERD symptoms, such as heartburn, and typical symptoms of aspiration such as hoarseness, cough, or dyspnea are not enough to positively identify PR. While patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure are three times more likely than those with normal values to have PR, abnormal esophageal acid exposure alone does not identify all patients with PR. Therefore, relying on symptoms and standard diagnostic testing may fail to identify patients with extraesophageal reflux. Pharyngeal pH monitoring should be considered for patients with suspected reflux-induced airway disease.

摘要

背景

酸的咽反流异常(通过pH监测测定)与微量误吸相关,并且是气道症状对药物和手术抗反流治疗反应的良好预测指标。然而,在临床实践中,气道疾病与胃食管反流病(GERD)之间的联系仍基于典型症状(如烧心)的存在和/或标准食管功能测试(测压和24小时pH监测)。咽反流很少直接测量。我们进行这项研究以确定典型症状和标准测试是否能可靠地预测咽反流的存在。

方法

研究组由1998年12月至2002年1月期间评估的518例疑似反流性气道疾病患者组成。每位患者完成一份标准化症状问卷,接受食管测压以及24小时食管和咽部pH监测。如果在pH监测期间检测到>1次咽反流发作,则将患者分类为咽反流异常(PR+)。

结果

181例患者为PR+,337例为PR-。最常见的症状,即咳嗽(PR+组73%,PR-组68%)、声音嘶哑(PR+组64%,PR-组66%)和呼吸困难(PR+组59%,PR-组59%)在PR+和PR-患者中的发生率相似。烧心的发生率在PR+患者中为54%,在PR-患者中为52%。逻辑回归分析显示食管酸暴露异常是PR+的一个预测指标(P<0.001)。烧心或特定呼吸道症状的存在、食管下括约肌(LES)或食管上括约肌(UES)的压力,或食管收缩幅度均不能预测PR+。食管长度(UES至LES)存在很大差异,因此远端pH探头距LES的位置差异很大(中位数=13cm,2 - 20cm)。使用已确立的食管多个水平酸暴露的正常值,24%的PR+患者食管酸暴露量正常。

结论

典型的GERD症状,如烧心,以及误吸的典型症状,如声音嘶哑、咳嗽或呼吸困难,不足以明确识别咽反流。虽然食管酸暴露异常的患者发生咽反流的可能性是正常值患者的三倍,但仅食管酸暴露异常并不能识别所有咽反流患者。因此,依靠症状和标准诊断测试可能无法识别食管外反流患者。对于疑似反流性气道疾病的患者,应考虑进行咽部pH监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验