• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患者安全指标:它们在退伍军人健康管理局的数据上表现如何?

Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?

作者信息

Rosen Amy K, Rivard Peter, Zhao Shibei, Loveland Susan, Tsilimingras Dennis, Christiansen Cindy L, Elixhauser Anne, Romano Patrick S

机构信息

Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, Bedford VAMC (152), Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):873-84. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb
PMID:16116352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), an administrative data-based tool developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, are increasingly being used to screen for potential in-hospital patient safety problems. Although the Veterans Health Administration (VA) is a national leader in patient safety, accurate information on the epidemiology of patient safety events in the VA is still unavailable.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to: (1) apply the AHRQ PSI software to VA administrative data to identify potential instances of compromised patient safety; (2) determine occurrence rates of PSI events in the VA; and (3) examine the construct validity of the PSIs.

METHODS

We examined differences between observed and risk-adjusted PSI rates in the VA, compared VA and non-VA PSI rates, and investigated the construct validity of the PSIs by examining correlations of the PSIs with other outcomes of VA hospitalizations.

RESULTS

We identified 11,411 PSI events in the VA nationwide in FY'01. Observed PSI rates per 1000 discharges ranged from 0.007 for "transfusion reaction" to 155.5 for "failure to rescue." There were significant, although small, differences between VA and non-VA risk-adjusted PSI rates. Hospitalizations with PSI events had longer lengths of stay, higher mortality, and higher costs than those without PSI events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the PSIs may be useful as a patient safety screening tool in the VA. Our PSI rates were consistent with the national incidence of low rates; however, differences between VA and non-VA rates suggest that inadequate case-mix adjustment may be contributing to these findings.

摘要

背景

患者安全指标(PSIs)是美国医疗保健研究与质量局开发的一种基于行政数据的工具,越来越多地用于筛查医院内潜在的患者安全问题。尽管退伍军人健康管理局(VA)在患者安全方面处于全国领先地位,但VA中患者安全事件流行病学的准确信息仍然无法获取。

目的

我们的目的是:(1)将AHRQ PSI软件应用于VA行政数据,以识别患者安全受到损害的潜在情况;(2)确定VA中PSI事件的发生率;(3)检验PSIs的结构效度。

方法

我们检查了VA中观察到的PSI率与风险调整后的PSI率之间的差异,比较了VA和非VA的PSI率,并通过检查PSIs与VA住院其他结果的相关性来调查PSIs的结构效度。

结果

我们在2001财年在全国范围内的VA中识别出11411起PSI事件。每1000例出院患者中观察到的PSI率从“输血反应”的0.007到“未能挽救”的155.5不等。VA和非VA风险调整后的PSI率之间存在显著差异,尽管差异较小。发生PSI事件的住院患者比未发生PSI事件的患者住院时间更长、死亡率更高且费用更高。

结论

我们的结果表明,PSIs可能作为VA中的患者安全筛查工具有用。我们的PSI率与全国低发生率一致;然而,VA和非VA率之间的差异表明,病例组合调整不足可能是导致这些结果的原因。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?评估患者安全指标:它们在退伍军人健康管理局的数据上表现如何?
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):873-84. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb.
2
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标对儿童医院的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):135-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1083. Epub 2004 Dec 3.
3
Comparing measures of patient safety for inpatient care provided to veterans within and outside the VA system in New York.比较纽约退伍军人事务部(VA)系统内外为退伍军人提供的住院护理的患者安全措施。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):58-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020735.
4
Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.基于美国退伍军人事务部国家外科质量改进计划数据的选定美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标的有效性
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):182-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00905.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
5
Tracking rates of Patient Safety Indicators over time: lessons from the Veterans Administration.随时间推移追踪患者安全指标的比率:来自退伍军人事务部的经验教训。
Med Care. 2006 Sep;44(9):850-61. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220686.82472.9c.
6
Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.选定的患者安全指标的有效性:机会与关注。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):924-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
7
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?验证退伍军人健康管理局的患者安全指标:它们是否能准确识别真实的安全事件?
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):74-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182293edf.
8
Using patient safety indicators to estimate the impact of potential adverse events on outcomes.使用患者安全指标来评估潜在不良事件对治疗结果的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Feb;65(1):67-87. doi: 10.1177/1077558707309611.
9
Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions.审查 AHRQ 患者安全指标 (PSIs) 对退伍军人健康管理局的影响:再入院案例。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7.
10
Patient Safety Indicators: using administrative data to identify potential patient safety concerns.患者安全指标:利用管理数据识别潜在的患者安全问题。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 2):110-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Postoperative Adverse Events on Hospitalization Expenditures and Length of Stay Among Surgery Patients in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Case-Control Study.台湾手术患者术后不良事件对住院费用和住院时间的影响:一项基于全国人口的病例对照研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 10;8:599843. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.599843. eCollection 2021.
2
Failure to rescue in surgical patients: A review for acute care surgeons.手术患者的抢救失败:急性护理外科医生的综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):699-706. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002365.
3
Improved hospital safety performance and reduced medicolegal risk: an ecological study using 2 Canadian databases.
改善医院安全绩效并降低医疗法律风险:一项使用两个加拿大数据库的生态学研究。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Nov 19;6(4):E561-E566. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180077. Print 2018 Oct-Dec.
4
Comparing VA to Non-VA Care.将退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗与非退伍军人事务部医疗进行比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Feb;32(2):150-151. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3893-x.
5
Incidence and Determinants of Traumatic Intracranial Bleeding Among Older Veterans Receiving Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation.接受华法林抗凝治疗的老年房颤退伍军人创伤性颅内出血的发生率和决定因素。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;1(1):65-72. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0345.
6
Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.比较退伍军人事务部(VA)与非退伍军人事务部的医疗质量:一项系统综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):105-121. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3775-2. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Association of inpatient hospital experience with patient safety indicators: a cross-sectional, Canadian study.住院医院体验与患者安全指标的关联:一项横断面加拿大研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 1;6(7):e011242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011242.
8
Establishing standard hospital performance measures for cervical spinal trauma: a Nationwide In-patient Sample study.建立颈椎脊髓损伤的标准医院绩效指标:一项全国住院患者样本研究。
Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr;54(4):306-13. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.185. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
9
Using estimated true safety event rates versus flagged safety event rates: does it change hospital profiling and payment?使用估计的真实安全事件率与标记的安全事件率:这会改变医院的形象和支付方式吗?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1426-45. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12180. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Characterization of adverse events detected in a large health care delivery system using an enhanced global trigger tool over a five-year interval.利用强化全球触发工具在五年时间间隔内对大型医疗保健提供系统中检测到的不良事件进行特征描述。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1407-25. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12163. Epub 2014 Mar 13.