• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性化脓性细菌性支气管炎的对比研究

Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute purulent bacterial bronchitis.

作者信息

Dere W H, Farlow D, Therasse D G, Jacobson K D, Guerra F J

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):166-77.

PMID:1611641
Abstract

In this single-blind study, 488 patients with acute bronchitis were randomly assigned to receive 400 mg of loracarbef twice daily or 500/125 mg of amoxicillin/clavulanate three times daily for seven days. Treatment efficacy was evaluated in 98 patients treated with loracarbef and in 99 treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate in whom pretreatment positive cultures of pathogens susceptible to both study drugs were found. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated in pure or mixed cultures in 64% of the evaluable patients; S pneumoniae was found in 26%. Among the evaluable patients, the rate of favorable clinical responses (cure and improvement) in the loracarbef group (96 of 98 patients; 98.0%) was similar to that in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (96 of 99 patients; 97.0%); the favorable bacteriologic response rates were also similar (93.7% vs 92.9%, respectively). Eight patients in the loracarbef group and nine in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The events were presumed to be drug related in five of the loracarbef group and in seven of the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. During therapy, diarrhea was the most frequently reported event in both groups. However, it occurred in only 8.2% of the loracarbef-treated patients compared with 22.5% of the amoxicillin/clavulanate patients (P less than 0.001). It is concluded that both loracarbef and amoxicillin/clavulanate are safe and effective in the treatment of acute purulent bacterial bronchitis.

摘要

在这项单盲研究中,488例急性支气管炎患者被随机分配,分别接受每日两次400毫克氯碳头孢或每日三次500/125毫克阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗,疗程均为7天。对98例接受氯碳头孢治疗且治疗前两种研究药物对其病原体均敏感的阳性培养结果的患者,以及99例接受阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗的患者进行了治疗效果评估。在64%的可评估患者中,从纯培养或混合培养物中分离出肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、卡他莫拉菌(卡他布兰汉菌)和肺炎克雷伯菌;肺炎链球菌的分离率为26%。在可评估患者中,氯碳头孢组(98例患者中的96例;98.0%)的良好临床反应率(治愈和改善)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸组(99例患者中的96例;97.0%)相似;良好的细菌学反应率也相似(分别为93.7%和92.9%)。氯碳头孢组有8例患者、阿莫西林/克拉维酸组有9例患者因不良事件而停药。氯碳头孢组有5例、阿莫西林/克拉维酸组有7例事件被认为与药物相关。治疗期间,腹泻是两组中报告最频繁的事件。然而,氯碳头孢治疗的患者中腹泻发生率仅为8.2%,而阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中腹泻发生率为22.5%(P<0.001)。结论是氯碳头孢和阿莫西林/克拉维酸在治疗急性化脓性细菌性支气管炎方面均安全有效。

相似文献

1
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute purulent bacterial bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性化脓性细菌性支气管炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):166-77.
2
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):214-29.
3
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗支气管肺炎和大叶性肺炎的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):254-67.
4
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media with effusion.
J Pediatr. 1992 Jun;120(6):980-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81974-2.
5
Efficacy of clarithromycin vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1993 Dec;72(12):804-10.
6
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与头孢克洛治疗急性细菌性支气管炎的对比
Clin Ther. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-53.
7
Loracarbef (LY 163892) vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in bacterial maxillary sinusitis.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1992 May;71(5):225-32.
8
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯短程疗法(5天)治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2528-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2528.
9
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染患者的临床比较
Clin Ther. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):861-74. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80064-6.
10
Eradication of pathogens from the nasopharynx after therapy of acute maxillary sinusitis with low- or high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.使用低剂量或高剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性上颌窦炎后,从鼻咽部清除病原体。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Nov;26(5):416-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.08.012. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Loracarbef. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.氯碳头孢。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1993 May;45(5):716-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345050-00008.
2
Acute bronchitis: results of U.S. and European trials of antibiotic therapy.急性支气管炎:美国和欧洲抗生素治疗试验的结果
Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):53S-57S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90608-e.