• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较

Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Zeckel M L, Jacobson K D, Guerra F J, Therasse D G, Farlow D

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):214-29.

PMID:1611645
Abstract

In this single-blind study, 579 patients with chronic bronchitis were randomly assigned to receive 400 mg of loracarbef twice daily or 500/125 mg of amoxicillin/clavulanate thrice daily for seven days. Treatment efficacy was evaluated in 129 of the loracarbef-treated patients and 120 amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients in whom pretreatment positive cultures of pathogens susceptible to both antibiotics were isolated. Three organisms predominated in either pure or mixed cultures in 57.0% of the evaluable patients: Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis; H influenzae was isolated in 25.0% of the patients with single pathogens. Among the evaluable patients, favorable clinical responses (cure or improvement) were noted in 93.8% of the loracarbef-treated patients and in 95.0% of the amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients. A favorable bacteriologic response (pathogen eliminated or presumed eliminated) was found in 82.2% of loracarbef-treated patients and 90.0% of amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients. Six patients in the loracarbef group and 14 in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The events were judged to be drug related in four loracarbef-treated patients and in 11 amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients. The incidence of diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms was significantly more frequent in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (13.5% and 5.6%) than in the loracarbef group (4.5% and 1.7%), while the incidence of severe headaches was significantly more frequent in the loracarbef than the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (7.2% vs 3.1%). It is concluded that loracarbef and amoxicillin/clavulanate are safe and effective in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

摘要

在这项单盲研究中,579例慢性支气管炎患者被随机分配,分别接受每日两次400毫克氯碳头孢或每日三次500/125毫克阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗,疗程均为7天。对129例接受氯碳头孢治疗的患者和120例接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者进行了治疗效果评估,这些患者在治疗前分离出了对两种抗生素敏感的病原体阳性培养物。在57.0%的可评估患者中,三种微生物在纯培养或混合培养中占主导地位:流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎链球菌或卡他莫拉菌(布兰汉菌属);25.0%的单一病原体患者分离出流感嗜血杆菌。在可评估患者中,氯碳头孢治疗组93.8%的患者和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗组95.0%的患者出现了良好的临床反应(治愈或改善)。氯碳头孢治疗组82.2%的患者和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗组90.0%的患者出现了良好的细菌学反应(病原体清除或推测清除)。氯碳头孢组有6例患者、阿莫西林/克拉维酸组有14例患者因不良事件而停药。4例接受氯碳头孢治疗的患者和11例接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者的不良事件被判定与药物有关。阿莫西林/克拉维酸组腹泻和其他胃肠道症状的发生率(分别为13.5%和5.6%)显著高于氯碳头孢组(分别为4.5%和1.7%),而氯碳头孢组严重头痛的发生率显著高于阿莫西林/克拉维酸组(7.2%对3.1%)。结论是,氯碳头孢和阿莫西林/克拉维酸在治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染方面是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):214-29.
2
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute purulent bacterial bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性化脓性细菌性支气管炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):166-77.
3
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗支气管肺炎和大叶性肺炎的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):254-67.
4
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与头孢克洛治疗急性细菌性支气管炎的对比
Clin Ther. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-53.
5
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media with effusion.
J Pediatr. 1992 Jun;120(6):980-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81974-2.
6
Efficacy of clarithromycin vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1993 Dec;72(12):804-10.
7
Loracarbef (LY 163892) vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in bacterial maxillary sinusitis.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1992 May;71(5):225-32.
8
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染患者的临床比较
Clin Ther. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):861-74. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80064-6.
9
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯短程疗法(5天)治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2528-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2528.
10
Loracarbef (LY163892) in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: results of U.S. and European comparative clinical trials.
Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):58S-64S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90609-f.

引用本文的文献

1
Positively selected codons in immune-exposed loops of the vaccine candidate OMP-P1 of Haemophilus influenzae.流感嗜血杆菌候选疫苗OMP-P1免疫暴露环中的正选择密码子。
J Mol Evol. 2007 Apr;64(4):411-22. doi: 10.1007/s00239-006-0021-2. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
2
Effects of various media on the activity of NXL103 (formerly XRP 2868), a new oral streptogramin, against Haemophilus influenzae.多种培养基对新型口服链阳菌素NXL103(原称XRP 2868)抗流感嗜血杆菌活性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Nov;50(11):3914-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00587-06.
3
Activities of two novel macrolides, GW 773546 and GW 708408, compared with those of telithromycin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against Haemophilus influenzae.
两种新型大环内酯类药物GW 773546和GW 708408与泰利霉素、红霉素、阿奇霉素及克拉霉素相比,对流感嗜血杆菌的抗菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Nov;48(11):4113-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4113-4119.2004.
4
Activities of a new oral streptogramin, XRP 2868, compared to those of other agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae and haemophilus species.新型口服链阳菌素XRP 2868与其他药物相比,对肺炎链球菌和嗜血杆菌属的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3270-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3270-3274.2003.
5
In vitro selection of resistance in Haemophilus influenzae by amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, azithromycin, and clarithromycin.阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢泊肟、头孢丙烯、阿奇霉素和克拉霉素对流感嗜血杆菌体外耐药性的筛选
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Sep;46(9):2956-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2956-2962.2002.
6
Susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis to ABT-773 compared to their susceptibilities to 11 other agents.与流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌对其他11种药物的敏感性相比,它们对ABT-773的敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Jan;45(1):67-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.67-72.2001.
7
Activities and postantibiotic effects of gemifloxacin compared to those of 11 other agents against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis.与其他11种药物相比,吉米沙星对流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌的活性及抗生素后效应。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Mar;44(3):633-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.3.633-639.2000.
8
Loracarbef. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.氯碳头孢。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1993 May;45(5):716-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345050-00008.