Nuyen Jasper, Volkers Anita C, Verhaak Peter F M, Schellevis François G, Groenewegen Peter P, Van den Bos Geertrudis A M
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2005 Aug;35(8):1185-95. doi: 10.1017/s0033291705004812.
Depression is highly co-morbid with both psychiatric and chronic somatic disease. These types of co-morbidity have been shown to exert opposite effects on underdiagnosis of depression by general practitioners (GPs). However, past research has not addressed their combined effect on underdiagnosis of depression.
Co-morbidity data on 191 depressed primary-care patients selected by a two-stage sampling procedure were analysed. Diagnoses of major depression and/or dysthymia in the last 12 months were assessed using a standardized psychiatric interview (CIDI) and compared with depression diagnoses registered by GPs in patient contacts during the same period. Presence of psychiatric and chronic somatic co-morbidity was determined using the CIDI and contact registration, respectively.
Regression analysis showed a significant interaction effect between psychiatric and chronic somatic co-morbidity on GPs' diagnosis of depression, while taking into account the effects of sociodemographic variables, depression severity and number of GP contacts. Subsequent stratified analysis revealed that in patients without chronic somatic co-morbidity, a lower educational level, a less severe depression, and fewer GP contacts all significantly increased the likelihood of not being diagnosed as depressed. In contrast, in patients with chronic somatic co-morbidity, only having no psychiatric co-morbidity significantly decreased the likelihood of receiving a depression diagnosis.
Our results indicate that the effects of psychiatric co-morbidity and other factors on underdiagnosis of depression by GPs differ between depressed patients with and without chronic somatic co-morbidity. Efforts to improve depression diagnosis by GPs seem to require different strategies for depressed patients with and without chronic somatic co-morbidity.
抑郁症与精神疾病和慢性躯体疾病高度共病。已表明这些共病类型对全科医生(GP)漏诊抑郁症具有相反的影响。然而,过去的研究尚未探讨它们对抑郁症漏诊的综合影响。
分析了通过两阶段抽样程序选取的191名初级保健抑郁症患者的共病数据。使用标准化精神科访谈(复合性国际诊断交谈检查表,CIDI)评估过去12个月内的重度抑郁症和/或心境恶劣诊断,并与同期全科医生在患者就诊时记录的抑郁症诊断进行比较。分别使用CIDI和就诊记录确定精神疾病和慢性躯体共病的存在情况。
回归分析显示,在考虑社会人口统计学变量、抑郁严重程度和全科医生就诊次数的影响时,精神疾病和慢性躯体共病之间对全科医生诊断抑郁症存在显著的交互作用。随后的分层分析显示,在无慢性躯体共病的患者中,较低的教育水平、较轻的抑郁程度和较少的全科医生就诊次数均显著增加未被诊断为抑郁症的可能性。相反,在有慢性躯体共病的患者中,仅无精神疾病共病显著降低了被诊断为抑郁症的可能性。
我们的结果表明,精神疾病共病和其他因素对全科医生漏诊抑郁症的影响在有和无慢性躯体共病的抑郁症患者中有所不同。提高全科医生对抑郁症诊断的努力似乎需要针对有和无慢性躯体共病的抑郁症患者采取不同的策略。