Cook Chad, Brismée Jean-Michel, Fleming Robert, Sizer Phillip S
Duke University Medical Center 3907, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Phys Ther. 2005 Sep;85(9):895-906.
Clinical cervical spine instability (CCSI) is controversial and difficult to diagnose. Within the literature, no clinical or diagnostic tests that yield valid and reliable results have been described to differentially diagnose this condition. The purpose of this study was to attempt to obtain consensus on symptoms and physical examination findings that are associated with CCSI.
One hundred seventy-two physical therapists who were Orthopaedic Certified Specialists (OCS) or Fellows of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (FAAOMPT) participated in the survey.
This study was a 3-round Delphi survey designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for CCSI.
The symptoms that reached the highest consensus among respondents were "intolerance to prolonged static postures," "fatigue and inability to hold head up," "better with external support, including hands or collar," "frequent need for self-manipulation," "feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control," "frequent episodes of acute attacks," and "sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements." The physical examination findings related to cervical instability that reached the highest consensus among respondents included "poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movement," "abnormal joint play," "motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming," and "aberrant movement."
The Delphi method is useful in situations where clinical judgments are encountered but empirical evidence to provide evidence-based decision making does not exist. Findings of this study may provide beneficial clinical information, specifically when the identifiers are clustered together, because no set of clinical examination and symptom standards for CCSI currently exists. Diagnosis of CCSI is challenging; therefore, appropriate clinical reasoning is required for distinctive physical therapy assessment using pertinent symptoms and physical examination findings.
临床颈椎不稳(CCSI)存在争议且难以诊断。在文献中,尚未描述能产生有效可靠结果以鉴别诊断该病症的临床或诊断测试。本研究的目的是尝试就与CCSI相关的症状和体格检查结果达成共识。
172名骨科认证专家(OCS)或美国骨科手法物理治疗师学会会员(FAAOMPT)的物理治疗师参与了此次调查。
本研究是一项三轮德尔菲调查,旨在就CCSI的症状和体格检查结果达成共识。
在受访者中达成最高共识的症状为“不耐受长时间静态姿势”“疲劳且无法抬头”“外部支撑(包括手或颈托)可改善症状”“频繁自我调整的需求”“不稳定、摇晃或缺乏控制的感觉”“急性发作频繁”以及“突然运动时可能出现的剧痛”。在受访者中达成最高共识的与颈椎不稳相关的体格检查结果包括“协调/神经肌肉控制不佳,包括运动时颈椎节段募集和分离不良”“异常关节活动”“整个活动范围(ROM)内运动不顺畅,包括节段性铰链运动、枢转或支点运动”以及“异常运动”。
德尔菲法在遇到临床判断但缺乏基于证据的决策的实证证据的情况下很有用。本研究结果可能提供有益的临床信息,特别是当这些标识符聚集在一起时,因为目前尚无CCSI的临床检查和症状标准集。CCSI的诊断具有挑战性;因此,在使用相关症状和体格检查结果进行独特的物理治疗评估时,需要适当的临床推理。