Suppr超能文献

颈椎稳定训练对慢性颈部疼痛和上颈椎功能障碍患者是否立即有效?随机对照试验。

Is Cervical Stabilization Exercise Immediately Effective in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain and Upper Cervical Spine Dysfunction? Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Sanz Jacobo, Malo-Urriés Miguel, Lucha-López María Orosia, Corral-de-Toro Jaime, González-Rueda Vanessa, López-de-Celis Carlos, Pérez-Bellmunt Albert, Hidalgo-García César

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Barcelona, Spain.

ACTIUM Anatomy Group, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2022 May 11;12(5):714. doi: 10.3390/life12050714.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of a single exercise session with manual therapy techniques in the segments of the upper cervical spine (C0−1, C1−2 and C2−3), against a single exercise session in patients with chronic neck pain and mobility deficits in the upper cervical spine. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was performed. Fifty-eight patients were recruited (29 for the manual therapy and exercise group and 29 for the exercise group) who presented chronic neck pain and upper cervical spine dysfunction. The exercise focused on the deep muscles. The manual therapy combined manipulations and mobilizations with these exercises. Cervical range of motion, flexion-rotation test, pressure pain threshold and pain intensity were measured by a blind evaluator before and after the intervention. Results: Compared to pre-intervention, after intervention, the exercise group was significantly lower in terms of the range of motion, flexion-rotation test, and pressure pain threshold (p < 0.05). The manual therapy and exercise group improved in upper cervical flexion, the flexion-rotation test and intensity of pain (p < 0.05). Conclusions: It may be necessary to normalize the mobility of the upper cervical spine before cervical stabilization training, in patients with chronic neck pain and mobility deficits in the upper cervical spine.

摘要

目的

比较单次颈椎上段(C0−1、C1−2和C2−3)手法治疗技术训练与单次运动训练对慢性颈痛且颈椎上段活动度不足患者的效果。方法:进行单盲随机对照试验。招募了58例表现为慢性颈痛和颈椎上段功能障碍的患者(手法治疗与运动组29例,运动组29例)。运动训练聚焦于深层肌肉。手法治疗则将手法操作和松动术与这些运动相结合。干预前后由一名盲法评估者测量颈椎活动范围、屈伸旋转试验、压痛阈值和疼痛强度。结果:与干预前相比,干预后运动组在活动范围、屈伸旋转试验和压痛阈值方面显著降低(p < 0.05)。手法治疗与运动组在上段颈椎前屈、屈伸旋转试验和疼痛强度方面有所改善(p < 0.05)。结论:对于慢性颈痛且颈椎上段活动度不足的患者,在进行颈椎稳定训练前,可能有必要使颈椎上段活动度恢复正常。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a08f/9147665/7fc9abc98982/life-12-00714-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验