Schölmerich J, Lausen M, Lay L, Salm R, Rückauer K, Gross V, Roth M, Leser H G, Farthmann E H
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Endoscopy. 1992 May;24(4):244-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010475.
We have recently shown that ERCP is the most useful technique for detecting a biliary origin of acute pancreatitis and can be done without side effects. We now report on a second series of 50 patients with acute pancreatitis in whom ERCP, computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and clinical and laboratory assessment were performed within the first 24 to 48 hours of hospitalization. A score for ERCP, CT and US was used to assess the severity of the disease. Patients were followed up until discharge or death and their condition classified according to outcome as mild (less than or equal to 1 complication), severe (greater than 1 complication) or fatal. ERCP was superior in detecting choledochal stones (ERCP 100%, US 25%, CT 50%) and dilated intrahepatic ducts (ERCP 75%, US 75%, CT 37%) but not gallbladder stones (ERCP 70%, US 100%, CT 60%). When the ERCP severity score was calculated there was no relevant difference between patients thereafter having a mild course (0.66 +/- 0.91, range 0-3), a severe course (1.3 +/- 0.80, range 0-3), or a fatal outcome (1.0 +/- 1.1, range 0-3). In contrast, the CT score was different in all three groups (mild: 3.0 +/- 1.9; severe: 5.3 +/- 3.2; lethal: 6.3 +/- 3.1) as was the US score (mild: 1.5 +/- 1.3; severe: 3.2 +/- 2.3; lethal: 4.4 +/- 1.4). It is concluded from these results that ERCP is of value in defining the origin of acute pancreatitis. When a biliary origin is detected this can lead to immediate treatment using endoscopic sphincterotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们最近发现,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是检测急性胰腺炎胆源性病因最有用的技术,且无副作用。我们现在报告第二组50例急性胰腺炎患者的情况,这些患者在住院的最初24至48小时内接受了ERCP、计算机断层扫描(CT)、超声(US)以及临床和实验室评估。采用ERCP、CT和US评分来评估疾病的严重程度。对患者进行随访直至出院或死亡,并根据结局将其病情分为轻度(小于或等于1种并发症)、重度(大于1种并发症)或致命。ERCP在检测胆总管结石(ERCP为100%,US为25%,CT为50%)和肝内胆管扩张(ERCP为75%,US为75%,CT为37%)方面更具优势,但在检测胆囊结石方面并非如此(ERCP为70%,US为100%,CT为60%)。计算ERCP严重程度评分时,随后病程为轻度(0.66±0.91,范围0 - 3)、重度(1.3±0.80,范围0 - 3)或致命结局(1.0±1.1,范围0 - 3)的患者之间无显著差异。相比之下,三组患者的CT评分不同(轻度:3.0±1.9;重度:5.3±3.2;致命:6.3±3.1),US评分也不同(轻度:1.5±1.3;重度:3.2±2.3;致命:4.4±1.4)。从这些结果得出结论,ERCP在确定急性胰腺炎的病因方面具有价值。当检测到胆源性病因时,可立即采用内镜括约肌切开术进行治疗。(摘要截选至250字)