Islam Intekhab, Chng Hui Kheng, Yap Adrian U Jin
Department of Restoraive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore.
Aust Endod J. 2005 Aug;31(2):59-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00223.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, ProRoot MTA (Tooth-Coloured Formula), ordinary Portland cement and white Portland cement when used as root-end filling materials. Twenty-four single-rooted human premolars were prepared and obturated using standard techniques, then retrofilled with the test materials. The prepared teeth were immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 72 hours and then assessed for dye leakage. The depth of dye penetration was measured and expressed as a percentage of the length of the retrofilling. Data was analysed using ANOVA and Fisher's Least Significant Test (LSD) (p < 0.05). None of the teeth in any of the test groups showed leakage beyond the retrofillings. Given the low cost and apparently similar sealing ability of the cements, it is reasonable to consider Portland cement as a possible substitute for MTA as a root-end filling material. However, further tests, especially in vivo biocompatibility tests, need to be conducted before Portland cement can be recommended for clinical use.
本研究的目的是比较当用作根尖充填材料时,ProRoot MTA、ProRoot MTA(牙齿颜色配方)、普通波特兰水泥和白色波特兰水泥的体外封闭能力。使用标准技术制备并充填24颗单根人类前磨牙,然后用测试材料进行倒充填。将制备好的牙齿浸泡在1%的亚甲蓝染料中72小时,然后评估染料渗漏情况。测量染料渗透深度,并表示为倒充填长度的百分比。使用方差分析和Fisher最小显著差异检验(LSD)(p<0.05)对数据进行分析。任何测试组中的牙齿均未显示出超出倒充填物的渗漏。鉴于水泥成本低且封闭能力明显相似,将波特兰水泥视为MTA作为根尖充填材料的可能替代品是合理的。然而,在推荐波特兰水泥用于临床之前,需要进行进一步的测试,尤其是体内生物相容性测试。