• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者自主选择剖宫产——缅因州的经验

Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.

作者信息

Wax Joseph R, Cartin Angelina, Pinette Michael G, Blackstone Jacquelyn

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, United States.

出版信息

Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x
PMID:16128974
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient choice cesarean refers to elective primary cesarean in the absence of a medical or obstetrical indication. The purpose of this study was to determine obstetricians' attitudes and practices with respect to patient choice cesarean in Maine, United States.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all Maine Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists actively practicing obstetrics, after receiving institutional review exemption. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, or chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight of 110 (70.9%) obstetricians responded. Of these, 60 of 71 (84.5%) respondents performed or were willing to perform patient choice cesarean. However, 15 of 71 (21.1%) preferred a cesarean delivery for themselves (women) or partners (men). Indications included urinary continence (53.3%), adverse previous birth experience (41.7%), anal continence (35.0%), concern for fetal death or injury (33.3%), and fear of childbirth, preservation of sexual function, or pelvic organ prolapse (26.7% each). Less frequent were pain (11.7%), convenience (8.3%), and provider availability (10.0%). In addition, 82.1 percent believed medical evidence and 85.9 percent believed ethical issues sometimes or always supported patient choice cesarean. Responses were similar by gender, age, and time interval from training completion with two exceptions. Women under age 35 years were more likely to opt for a cesarean delivery themselves (p = 0.04), and 42.9 percent of respondents under age 35 years interpreted the medical literature as supporting cesarean in all cases versus 4.2 percent of older colleagues (p = 0.008). Sixty-four of 78 (82.1%) respondents would find a randomized trial of planned vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery helpful in addressing the issue of patient choice cesarean.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Maine obstetricians were willing to perform patient choice cesarean, few preferred this delivery mode for themselves or their partners. A randomized trial of planned vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery is highly desired.

摘要

背景

患者选择剖宫产是指在没有医学或产科指征的情况下进行的选择性初次剖宫产。本研究的目的是确定美国缅因州产科医生对患者选择剖宫产的态度和做法。

方法

在获得机构审查豁免后,向缅因州所有积极从事产科工作的美国妇产科医师学会会员发送了一份问卷。使用描述性统计、Fisher精确检验或卡方检验对数据进行分析。

结果

110名产科医生中有78名(70.9%)回复。其中,71名受访者中有60名(84.5%)进行过或愿意进行患者选择剖宫产。然而,71名中有15名(21.1%)为自己(女性)或伴侣(男性)选择剖宫产。指征包括尿失禁(53.3%)、既往不良分娩经历(41.7%)、肛门失禁(35.0%)、担心胎儿死亡或受伤(33.3%)以及害怕分娩、保留性功能或盆腔器官脱垂(各26.7%)。疼痛(11.7%)、便利性(8.3%)和提供者可及性(10.0%)则较少见。此外,82.1%的人认为医学证据,85.9%的人认为伦理问题有时或总是支持患者选择剖宫产。按性别、年龄和完成培训后的时间间隔分类的回复相似,但有两个例外。35岁以下的女性更有可能自己选择剖宫产(p = 0.04),35岁以下的受访者中有42.9%将医学文献解释为在所有情况下都支持剖宫产,而年长同事中这一比例为4.2%(p = 0.008)。78名受访者中有64名(82.1%)认为计划阴道分娩与计划剖宫产的随机试验有助于解决患者选择剖宫产的问题。

结论

尽管缅因州的产科医生愿意进行患者选择剖宫产,但很少有人为自己或伴侣选择这种分娩方式。非常需要进行计划阴道分娩与计划剖宫产的随机试验。

相似文献

1
Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.患者自主选择剖宫产——缅因州的经验
Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x.
2
Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.土耳其产科医生对分娩方式的个人偏好和对产妇要求剖宫产的态度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;284(3):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1682-z. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
3
Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.剖宫产:挪威女性的做法与产科医生的教导背道而驰。
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00224.x.
4
Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery.医生对患者要求剖宫产的反应。
Birth. 2004 Dec;31(4):280-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00320.x.
5
Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions.再次剖宫产与初次择期剖宫产:近期接受培训的妇产科医生的执业模式与观点
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;192(6):1872-5; discussion 1875-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.046.
6
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns.产妇要求下的剖宫产:妇产科医生的知识、认知及实践模式
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6.
7
Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.择期剖宫产:泌尿妇科与母胎医学专家的态度
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):301-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000151110.05801.c0.
8
Scheduled cesarean delivery and the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus transmission: a survey of practicing obstetricians.择期剖宫产与预防人类免疫缺陷病毒传播:执业产科医生调查
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;185(2):327-31. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116741.
9
Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.产时选择性剖宫产:一种先前未被认识的临床实体。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1137-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128118.37737.df.
10
Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.通过产妇要求估算剖宫产率:对澳大利亚产科医生的匿名调查。
Birth. 2009 Sep;36(3):208-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00331.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.产妇要求剖宫产:瑞典一项与共享决策和以患者为中心的护理相关的冲突定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.
2
Fecal incontinence and associated pelvic floor dysfunction during and one year after the first pregnancy.首次妊娠期间及其后一年的粪便失禁和相关盆底功能障碍。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Aug;102(8):1034-1044. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14614. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.
女性选择剖宫产作为分娩方式是她们的决定吗?利益相关者观点的文献综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2.
4
Pregnancy-specific anxiety and elective cesarean section in primiparas: A cohort study in China.孕妇特定焦虑与初产妇选择性剖宫产术:中国的一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216870. eCollection 2019.
5
Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.为什么选择性剖宫产“抽签”在伦理上是不允许的。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):249-268. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0.
6
Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery.产前护理与社会经济地位:对剖宫产的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Mar 10;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0190-x.
7
Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model.影响女性分娩方式决策的因素:健康信念模式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 20;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0931-z.
8
Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan.台湾初产妇选择选择性剖宫产的决策过程。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jul;17(5):842-51. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1062-3.
9
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.产妇要求剖宫产:北卡罗来纳州西部的观点。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16(3):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0769-x.
10
The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III: a multi-site cohort study of the impact of delivery method on health, service use, and costs of care in the first postpartum year.安大略省母婴研究(TOMIS)III:一项关于分娩方式对产后第一年健康、服务使用和护理成本影响的多中心队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Apr 28;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-16.