• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前护理与社会经济地位:对剖宫产的影响。

Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery.

作者信息

Milcent Carine, Zbiri Saad

机构信息

Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques, French National Center for Scientific Research, Paris, France.

EA 7285, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2018 Mar 10;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0190-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13561-018-0190-x
PMID:29525909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5845483/
Abstract

Cesarean deliveries are widely used in many high- and middle-income countries. This overuse both increases costs and lowers quality of care and is thus a major concern in the healthcare industry. The study first examines the impact of prenatal care utilization on cesarean delivery rates. It then determines whether socioeconomic status affects the use of prenatal care and thereby influences the cesarean delivery decision. Using exclusive French delivery data over the 2008-2014 period, with multilevel logit models, and controlling for relevant patient and hospital characteristics, we show that women who do not participate in prenatal education have an increased probability of a cesarean delivery compared to those who do. The study further indicates that attendance at prenatal education varies according to socioeconomic status. Low socioeconomic women are more likely to have cesarean deliveries and less likely to participate in prenatal education. This result emphasizes the importance of focusing on pregnancy health education, particularly for low-income women, as a potential way to limit unnecessary cesarean deliveries. Future studies would ideally investigate the effect of interventions promoting such as care participation on cesarean delivery rates.

摘要

剖宫产在许多高收入和中等收入国家被广泛使用。这种过度使用既增加了成本又降低了护理质量,因此是医疗行业的一个主要担忧。该研究首先考察了产前护理利用对剖宫产率的影响。然后确定社会经济地位是否会影响产前护理的使用,从而影响剖宫产决策。利用2008 - 2014年期间法国独有的分娩数据,采用多层次逻辑模型,并控制相关的患者和医院特征,我们发现,与参加产前教育的女性相比,未参加产前教育的女性剖宫产的概率更高。该研究进一步表明,产前教育的参与情况因社会经济地位而异。社会经济地位低的女性更有可能进行剖宫产,而参与产前教育的可能性较小。这一结果强调了关注孕期健康教育的重要性,特别是对于低收入女性,这是限制不必要剖宫产的一种潜在方式。理想情况下,未来的研究将调查促进护理参与等干预措施对剖宫产率的影响。

相似文献

1
Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery.产前护理与社会经济地位:对剖宫产的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Mar 10;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0190-x.
2
Access to postpartum sterilization in southeast Brazil.巴西东南部产后绝育的途径。
Med Care. 1982 May;20(5):526-34. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198205000-00009.
3
Maternal mortality--a sharper focus on a major issue of our time.孕产妇死亡率——更聚焦于我们这个时代的一个重大问题。
Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;1(1):9-13.
4
Cesarean deliveries and maternal-infant HIV transmission: results from a prospective study in South Africa.剖宫产与母婴HIV传播:南非一项前瞻性研究的结果
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996 Apr 15;11(5):478-83. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199604150-00008.
5
Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system.社会经济地位会影响妊娠结局和并发症,即使有全民医疗保健系统也一样。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 5;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0715-7.
6
Rising rates of cesarean delivery in Ecuador: Socioeconomic and institutional determinants over two decades.厄瓜多尔剖宫产率上升:二十多年来的社会经济和制度决定因素。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):335-343. doi: 10.1111/birt.12421. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002.1996 - 2002年美国国防部医疗保健受益人群中产妇特征对剖宫产率的影响
Birth. 2004 Mar;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0268.x.
8
Situational analysis of antenatal care practices in rural Punjab.旁遮普邦农村地区产前护理实践的情况分析
Indian J Matern Child Health. 1992 Jan-Mar;3(1):16-8.
9
Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?剖宫产的费用总是比顺产高吗?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x.
10
Are cesarean deliveries more likely for poorly educated parents? A brief report from Italy.受教育程度低的父母剖宫产的可能性更大吗?来自意大利的一份简要报告。
Birth. 2008 Sep;35(3):241-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00245.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of WHO-recommended antenatal care visits, ultrasonography, and health education in reducing unnecessary caesarean sections among pregnant women in Bangladesh: a hospital-based randomised controlled trial.世界卫生组织推荐的产前检查、超声检查及健康教育在减少孟加拉国孕妇不必要剖宫产方面的效果:一项基于医院的随机对照试验
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 27;15:04182. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04182.
2
Overlapping social structures behind Brazil's cesarean section births: A decomposition analysis.巴西剖宫产分娩背后重叠的社会结构:一项分解分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325251. eCollection 2025.
3
Perinatal Outcomes Among Patients Using OB Teleflex, A Hybrid Prenatal Telemedicine Program.使用OB Teleflex(一种混合式产前远程医疗项目)的患者的围产期结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2025 Jun;47(6):102911. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102911. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
4
Temporal trends and associated factors in cesarean section use in the Philippines: an analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data from 1993 to 2017.菲律宾剖宫产使用情况的时间趋势及相关因素:对1993年至2017年人口与健康调查数据的分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07298-5.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparity in the Administration of General Anesthesia.全身麻醉实施中的种族和民族差异。
Anesth Crit Care. 2024;6(4):68-76. doi: 10.26502/acc.073. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
6
Unplanned Cesarean for Abnormal or Indeterminate Fetal Heart Tracing Varies Significantly by Race and Ethnicity.因胎儿心率异常或不明而进行的非计划剖宫产在种族和族裔方面存在显著差异。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 Mar-Apr;70(2):279-291. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13720. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
7
Reduce, reinforce, and replenish: safeguarding the early-life microbiota to reduce intergenerational health disparities.减少、增强和补充:保护早期微生物群以减少代际健康差距。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 23;12:1455503. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1455503. eCollection 2024.
8
The association of travel burden with prenatal care utilization, what happens after provider-selection.旅行负担与产前保健利用的关联:在选择提供者之后会发生什么。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11249-9.
9
Socioeconomic disadvantage and racial/ethnic disparities in low-risk cesarean birth in California.加利福尼亚州低风险剖宫产中的社会经济劣势与种族/民族差异
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):132-141. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae157.
10
Staff Resources in Public and Private Hospitals and Their Implication for Medical Practice: A French Study of Caesareans.公立和私立医院的人力资源及其对医疗实践的影响:一项关于剖腹产的法国研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1007. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101007.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.为什么女性会出于非医学原因要求选择性剖宫产?对定性文献的系统评价。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):109-119. doi: 10.1111/birt.12319. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
2
The Effects of Prenatal Care Utilization on Maternal Health and Health Behaviors.产前护理利用对孕产妇健康和健康行为的影响。
Health Econ. 2017 Aug;26(8):1001-1018. doi: 10.1002/hec.3380. Epub 2016 Jul 3.
3
Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model.影响女性分娩方式决策的因素:健康信念模式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 20;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0931-z.
4
Wide Variation Found In Hospital Facility Costs For Maternity Stays Involving Low-Risk Childbirth.医院设施成本在涉及低风险分娩的产妇住院方面存在广泛差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1212-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1088.
5
Systematic overuse of healthcare services: a conceptual model.医疗服务的系统性过度使用:一个概念模型。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Feb;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0126-5.
6
Mode of birth and social inequalities in health: the effect of maternal education and access to hospital care on cesarean delivery.出生方式与健康方面的社会不平等:母亲教育程度及获得医院护理的机会对剖宫产的影响。
Health Place. 2014 May;27:9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Fear of childbirth in nulliparous and multiparous women: a population-based analysis of all singleton births in Finland in 1997-2010.初产妇和经产妇的分娩恐惧:1997-2010 年芬兰所有单胎分娩的基于人群的分析。
BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):965-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12599. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
8
Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States.美国剖宫产术后试产的终生成本效益。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):953-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.014.
9
Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference?法国低危孕妇的产科干预措施:产科病房特征有影响吗?
Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):183-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00547.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years.不足的产前保健利用与婴儿死亡率和不良出生结局风险:对超过 8 年的 28729765 例美国分娩的回顾性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Nov;29(10):787-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1316439. Epub 2012 Jul 26.