• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产:挪威女性的做法与产科医生的教导背道而驰。

Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.

作者信息

Finsen Vilhjalmur, Storeheier Andreas Hopstock, Aasland Olaf Gjerløw

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Olav's University Hospital, and Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00224.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00224.x
PMID:18507582
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The worrying trend of an ever-increasing incidence of delivery by cesarean section has been commented on repeatedly. Studies from the United Kingdom and the United States have found that many obstetricians would choose cesarean section for themselves without strict medical indication, whereas similar studies from Denmark and Norway have indicated that almost none would choose cesarean section for themselves. The purpose of this study was to report the proportion of Norwegian obstetricians who have children born by cesarean section and to compare the rate with that among other physicians and that with the general population.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to 1,500 random members of the Norwegian general public, 1,500 randomly selected physicians, and 423 random surgeons asking whether they had children born by cesarean section. All were between the ages of 40 and 65 years.

RESULTS

The response rate was 78 percent. In the general public with children, 12 percent reported that one or more of them were born by cesarean section. The average was 8 percent among those with only basic schooling compared with 16 percent (p < 0.02) among those who had been to university for more than 4 years. This figure was 19 percent among physicians in general (p < 0.001 compared with the general population), 26 percent among surgeons, and 27 percent among the 189 specialists in obstetrics and gynecology (p < 0.02 compared with the physicians in general).

CONCLUSION

The rate of cesarean section in the general population is unlikely to fall as long as so many obstetricians have their own children delivered by cesarean section.

摘要

背景

剖宫产分娩发生率不断上升这一令人担忧的趋势已被多次提及。英国和美国的研究发现,许多产科医生在没有严格医学指征的情况下会为自己选择剖宫产,而丹麦和挪威的类似研究表明几乎没有人会为自己选择剖宫产。本研究的目的是报告挪威产科医生中其孩子为剖宫产出生的比例,并将该比例与其他医生以及普通人群的比例进行比较。

方法

向1500名挪威普通公众、1500名随机抽取的医生以及423名随机抽取的外科医生发放问卷,询问他们是否有孩子为剖宫产出生。所有受访者年龄均在40至65岁之间。

结果

回复率为78%。在有孩子的普通公众中,12%报告其一个或多个孩子为剖宫产出生。只有基础教育学历的人群中这一比例平均为8%,而接受过4年以上大学教育的人群中该比例为16%(p<0.02)。一般医生中这一比例为19%(与普通人群相比p<0.001),外科医生中为26%,189名妇产科专科医生中为27%(与一般医生相比p<0.02)。

结论

只要有如此多的产科医生让自己的孩子通过剖宫产出生,普通人群中的剖宫产率就不太可能下降。

相似文献

1
Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.剖宫产:挪威女性的做法与产科医生的教导背道而驰。
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00224.x.
2
Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.通过产妇要求估算剖宫产率:对澳大利亚产科医生的匿名调查。
Birth. 2009 Sep;36(3):208-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00331.x.
3
Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.患者自主选择剖宫产——缅因州的经验
Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x.
4
Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.择期剖宫产:泌尿妇科与母胎医学专家的态度
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):301-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000151110.05801.c0.
5
Norwegian obstetricians' opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves?挪威产科医生对孕妇要求剖宫产的看法:是否应由产妇自付费用?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Dec;89(12):1582-8. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.526181. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
6
Obstetricians' and midwives' attitudes toward cesarean section.产科医生和助产士对剖宫产的态度。
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):129-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00226.x.
7
Scheduled cesarean delivery and the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus transmission: a survey of practicing obstetricians.择期剖宫产与预防人类免疫缺陷病毒传播:执业产科医生调查
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;185(2):327-31. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116741.
8
Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.产时选择性剖宫产:一种先前未被认识的临床实体。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1137-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128118.37737.df.
9
Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions.再次剖宫产与初次择期剖宫产:近期接受培训的妇产科医生的执业模式与观点
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;192(6):1872-5; discussion 1875-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.046.
10
Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.土耳其产科医生对分娩方式的个人偏好和对产妇要求剖宫产的态度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;284(3):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1682-z. Epub 2010 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
C-sections and hospital characteristics: a long term analysis on low-risk deliveries.剖宫产与医院特征:对低风险分娩的长期分析
Res Health Serv Reg. 2022 Dec 14;1(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s43999-022-00014-2.
2
Cesarean section and childhood infections: Causality for concern?剖宫产与儿童期感染:是否值得担忧因果关系?
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 19;17(11):e1003457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003457. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
The ResQu Index: A new instrument to appraise the quality of research on birth place.ResQu指数:一种评估出生地研究质量的新工具。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182991. eCollection 2017.
4
Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.巴西圣卡塔琳娜州医学生对分娩方式的个人选择:一项横断面、定量研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jul 20;12:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-57.
5
Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway.诊断技术的采用与剖宫产率的变化:对挪威实践模式假说的检验。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2169-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01419.x. Epub 2012 May 17.