Handa Tomoya, Shimizu Kimiya, Mukuno Kazuo, Kawamorita Takushi, Uozato Hiroshi
Department of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Yokohama, Japan.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Aug;31(8):1588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.01.015.
To investigate the relationship between ocular dominance and binocular summation with monocular reading adds.
Department of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Contrast sensitivities were measured by having subjects view contrast charts at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree after the addition of positive spherical lenses that ranged from +1.0 to +3.0 diopters (D). Through the use of a balance technique, the test group was quantitatively divided into 12 weak and 8 strong ocular dominance subjects on the basis of binocular rivalry. In study 1, binocular contrast sensitivity was measured in the weak and strong ocular dominances by adding a positive spherical lens in front of 1 eye, whereas the other eye was fixed at a corrected distance.
In study 1, the binocular summation was observed only after adding positive spherical lenses in the nondominant eye. The differences in binocular contrast sensitivity that occurred after adding a positive spherical lens in the dominant eye versus that seen in the nondominant eye were statistically significant in the strong ocular dominance subjects who had +1.5 D and +2.0 D defocuses (P<.05; analysis of variance).
Binocular summation was effectively maintained with reading adds in the nondominant eye and was significantly influenced by the magnitude of ocular dominance. Evaluating binocular summation after monocular reading adds seems to be a good method to evaluate adaptability to monovision.
研究眼优势与单眼阅读附加镜双眼总和之间的关系。
日本神奈川县相模原市北里大学联合健康科学学院视光学与视觉科学系。
在受试者佩戴度数范围为+1.0至+3.0屈光度(D)的正球镜后,让他们观看空间频率为每度1.5、3.0、6.0、12.0和18.0周的对比图表,以此测量对比敏感度。通过平衡技术,根据双眼竞争将测试组定量分为12名弱眼优势受试者和8名强眼优势受试者。在研究1中,通过在一只眼前添加正球镜,同时另一只眼固定在矫正距离,测量弱眼优势和强眼优势受试者的双眼对比敏感度。
在研究1中,仅在非优势眼前添加正球镜后观察到双眼总和。在有+1.5 D和+2.0 D散焦的强眼优势受试者中,优势眼前添加正球镜后与非优势眼前添加正球镜后双眼对比敏感度的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05;方差分析)。
非优势眼的阅读附加镜能有效维持双眼总和,且受眼优势程度的显著影响。评估单眼阅读附加镜后的双眼总和似乎是评估对单眼视觉适应性的一种好方法。