Suppr超能文献

自酸蚀底漆用于未预备的V类树脂修复体的18个月临床性能

Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations.

作者信息

Brackett Willliam W, Brackett Martha Goel, Dib Alejandro, Franco Guillermo, Estudillo Hugo

机构信息

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):424-9.

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical performance of unprepared Class V resin composites, placed using a self-etching primer and a single-bottle adhesive, over a period of 18 months. Thirty-eight pairs of restorations of Renew hybrid resin composite (BISCO, Inc) were placed using adhesives from the same manufacturer in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Based on insensitivity to air, the dentin in 76% of these lesions was considered to be sclerotic. The restorations were placed without abrasion of tooth surfaces, except for cleaning with plain pumice. One of each pair was placed using Tyrian, a self-etching primer and the other was placed using One-Step, a single-bottle adhesive placed after acid etching. Both the etchant and self-etching primer were applied for 20 seconds. The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. For both adhesives, very low retention of 50% to 56% of the restorations was observed over 18 months, leading to the conclusion that tooth surfaces must receive some additional treatment prior to restoration with these adhesives. No statistically significant difference (p=0.75) between the two adhesives was observed in overall performance, and dentinal sclerosis and axial depth did not appear to be important factors in the study.

摘要

本研究评估了使用自酸蚀底漆和单瓶粘结剂放置的未预备的V类树脂复合材料在18个月期间的临床性能。使用来自同一制造商的粘结剂,在无龋的颈部侵蚀/磨损病变中放置了38对Renew混合树脂复合材料(BISCO公司)修复体。基于对空气不敏感,这些病变中76%的牙本质被认为是硬化的。除了用普通浮石清洁外,修复体在未对牙齿表面进行打磨的情况下放置。每对中的一个使用Tyrian自酸蚀底漆放置,另一个使用酸蚀后放置的单瓶粘结剂One-Step放置。酸蚀剂和自酸蚀底漆均应用20秒。使用改良的Ryge/USPHS标准在基线、6个月、12个月和18个月时对修复体进行临床评估。对于两种粘结剂,在18个月期间观察到修复体的保留率非常低,为50%至56%,得出的结论是,在用这些粘结剂进行修复之前,牙齿表面必须接受一些额外的处理。在总体性能方面,两种粘结剂之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.75),并且牙本质硬化和轴向深度在该研究中似乎不是重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验